Quote from: Stake on December 21, 2013, 10:53:57 PM

Quote from: Stunna on December 21, 2013, 10:36:39 PM

Quote from: Stake on December 21, 2013, 08:45:10 PM

Quote from: not.you on December 21, 2013, 03:36:41 PM

It is actually a violation of ICANN policy NOT to update whois info.

"...false Whois information can be grounds for cancellation of their domain name registration. Registrants must review their Whois data, and make any corrections."

There is plenty more legalistic mumbo-jumbo if you want to read it but bottom line is, if whois is inaccurate, you are in violation and the registration can be revoked.

http://www.icann.org/en/resources/registrars/whois-policies-provisions

I'm reading through this now. Thanks.

Trying to find how / where to change the information.

Notice to all: I'm not changing the information to hide anything. I have nothing to hide.

I am changing it to my personal information so that it's accurate with who actually possesses the domain name.

There is just significant proof pointing to the fact that you are him, I am considering leaving negative trust to at least warn users of the possibility.

Significant? What don't you understand that everything in the thread is circumstantial.

I believe it to be unfair that you do that especially considering anything could be a possibility...

Someone already left a negative trust on me. The only reason you think I am him is because I have a domain name with his name? I've already told you I bought the gandi.net account that owns the domain, man (even posted a picture)...

What do you want me to do? There is no "significant" proof - just circumstantial...

The fact that the domain for your wallet service is under a notorious scammers name, and the fact that you started posting on the forum a day after he left is a bit more than circumstantial evidence.

I think you keep forgetting the fact that I never called you a scammer as well, I'm just saying it is quite likely and thus I'm sure anyone doing business with you would like to know.

Deliver your 60+ pre-orders you claimed to have amassed, show me proof and I will remove my feedback. I think this is more than fair. I don't see why you'd want to take so many pre-orders in the first place when you haven't yet determined the feasibility/costs of this..