Quote from: ConquerGold on June 25, 2018, 06:00:16 AM

Quote from: shenglizhe on June 25, 2018, 05:30:41 AM

Quote from: tokeisou on June 25, 2018, 05:00:22 AM

Quote from: Umamisnack on June 25, 2018, 04:29:08 AM

Quote from: mushimushi on June 25, 2018, 04:00:50 AM

Quote from: OlympusMons on June 25, 2018, 03:30:06 AM

Quote from: ConquerGold on June 24, 2018, 05:58:53 AM

Quote from: Anonyms on June 24, 2018, 05:28:08 AM

Quote from: amir.malik on June 24, 2018, 04:57:08 AM

Quote from: OlympusMons on June 24, 2018, 04:29:24 AM

Quote from: dioanna on June 24, 2018, 02:03:34 AM

Quote from: Jrfranco on June 21, 2018, 12:36:05 AM

Wow a speculated 180 million dollar app? Progressive web apps? im not really a techqie person i dont even know this term
but the promises it gives stands out compare to apple store and google store app. If they can deliver what they promise users would definitely have this on their phones.

Being First in the industry a platform that uses blockchain plus the benefits PWA can give to the users, i can speculate that this token
would reach potential and deserved value.

An app store being implemented on blockchain industry is indeed a new thing, and the transactions involved would be slightly different because it would now involve crypto currencies. For crypto users, they would probably try it, but how are they gonna encourage those who are not into crypto?

I think if they partner up with OEM, there's a great possibility of patronage since it would be built in. Also, in case the apps available in the app store are free, then definitely users would feel that there would be no harm in buying or installing those apps.

Partnering with OEM would be great if it is a big and well sold brand, and more OEM would actually be better. I agree that people usually patronize free apps over apps with fees, like most social media apps and practical educational apps.

It would be a great idea since it would be multi-platform, for them to partner up with many OEM so that many devices would already have them and possibility of users trying them out. Having it already installed in the system would make users try it.

Having the yappadappadoo app store already installed in the system would encourage users to try it, and if the apps inside are free and worth it, we can expect patronage. Having partnerships with OEM companies would really be a great thing.

I think an partnership with OEM is essential for the success of this project since their tag line is "Bringing Revolutionary Multi-Platform Apps To All Users", and being multi platform, they can expect better market reach if the products people buy already has it.

Also, if they have partnership with OEM, we can expect that they have product tests and that they have tried and tested the apps multi platform functionality and that it performs well across all platforms.

If they are able to partner up with a big OEM and with many OEMs, then it would really be revolutionary since their app store is installed in many devices, and the apps available would probably be patronized.

I looked that up on the whitepaper and saw that it was part of the SWOT as opportunity, it is a great opportunity and I hope that they would be able to get partnership with device manufacturers and have them as their app store.

This is what is said about OEM partnerships in the whitepaper:

Quote

Device manufacturers
Mobile phone, tablet and other device manufacturers offer exceptional potential for publicising the yappadappadoo Store. With one stroke, we can potentially increase market penetration in a very significant way. In order to attract OEMs to participate in our bootstrap strategy we will consider broad-reaching partnerships with individual rewards for the number of devices with the yappadappadoo App Store pre-installed, revenue participation for sales and in-app purchases, etc.

For app stores, OEM partnership is really a great method for marketing since it increases visibility of the product. The question for this platform is that it currently a "potential" so when will they tell us that they made it?