Quote from: bitChipper on June 25, 2018, 02:14:53 PM

Quote from: hiphoptrail on June 16, 2018, 11:23:10 AM

Quote from: Cora_ED on June 16, 2018, 10:30:48 AM

It will be necessary to study in more detail the project itself and team if it is. I wonder what the project plans and goals, as well as methods of implementation and implementation. The coin may be issued purely for speculative purposes and does not carry anything of value. But a lot of good reviews from beginners. I wonder what it is, they are paid for it or not?

I'm not an investor that comes on bitcointalk to shill a project for personal gain.

The specs are great also. 21m total coins and only 3m coins in circulation. That's a winner to me. Add the masternodes and the project elevates even more.

hip hop and away...

Pretty much what you say you are not doing is exactly what you are doing Cheesy

The detail you go into about the specs are astonishing....wow just because it has 21m coins and 3m in circulation makes it a winner huh? Man it must have taken hours or research to come to that conclusion....

Go back 4-5 pages and you will see my post saying this coin WILL dump to 50-55k, guess I was right huh? Sorry but the only thing this coin has going for it is branding, and even then it's hijacking the bitcoin name and not even forking off. This is nothing more than a pivx/dash masternode clone with POS and a green branding angle.

Not that it's a terrible project, just don't believe hype, these young masternode coins are prone to consistent dumping right now.

I will show up here to agree with post and again criticize the useless defense of such a coin by the holders. I was also prone to public outbursts of defense for shitty/scam projects many times on bitcoin talk here. It is challenging to feel love and support for a coin then to invest in a new project, while not supporting the coin publicly (in hope of valuation) for obvious reason. Of course everybody wants the coin they are holding to gain, so the coin automatically has plenty of the supporters posting for its promotion... in total ignorance of the teams credibility, ability, or code efficacy.

I am changing my ways now and I am no longer holding any of these "out-of-nowhere" alt coins. Anybody can clone dash or pivx or whatever and rebrand it. I cloned Zcash in 5 minutes and with a few simple command line statements changed every single instance of the word Zcash to the name of my new coin. It is very easy requiring less than 5 minutes. However it is not so easy to get the genesis block on Zcash network because of deliberate obfuscation of such by the devs. However, this is likely not the case with bitg, dash, or any of those other coins that have genesis block generating scripts to easily accomplish the goal of a new coin in 5 minutes. Anybody investing in cryptos should know this by now. I never released my Zcash clone because there is absolutely no point in doing so. It was simply research at this time.

My point is, the efficacy/validity of this project can only be shown by the integrity of the team. If you do not know if the team has integrity then you should not be holding this coin. I made some good money from bitg and dumped at $7, thank god. Why did I dump them? Not because I dont like the idea of a green bitcoin. The thing I dont like is the total scam websites and twitter accounts made about 5 years ago (prior to scamlaunch/bitg) ... I did plenty of due diligence and I saw the "Spiderman" character involved with a big number of scam coins as the "lead dev" .. most of the coins failed. I can name a few just from memory- phor, hodl, well I forget the others . just websearch "con easy" I mean "konez" github for his weak-ass github page .. and if you want a review on one of the scam projects here is one:

https://bitcoinexchangeguide.com/hodl-coin/

and even if you think these projects are legit how can one guy be a "lead dev" on about 5 different coins (that I noticed in 30 mins of web searches)..

and the fake websites when investigating these supposed advisors of BITG.

this coin is a scam. if you don't believe me, then just ask yourselves how a lead dev can work on so many coins that are failing/broken and still have any attention to bitg, the one "legitimate" (yeah rite) coin.

I am not going to say any more here because all of the data is available through web searches, plenty enough to ask yourselves why you would hold such a coin.

Additionally, has the the "team" made good on any of the statements presented on the roadmap? After long enough the public will realize none of it has been adhered to and no longer value the coin.

I am all about proof of stake coins that do not involve proof of work mining and environmental destruction. however, at this time we have only one way to guarantee any value of a coin and that is the absurd amount of power ($) spent on generating the coin giving it a "floor" value .. ie: bitcoin.

when the coins spit out like water pouring with no energy involved to create, the ONLY thing you have to rely on is the INTEGRITY OF THE DEVELOPERS. in this case, I don't see any. Apologies folks, I am calling bullshit on this one.