Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] Guncoin(GUN) - GUN Core V1.5 - What's Next???
by
turntheothercheek
on 29/06/2018, 11:26:05 UTC

Well the sooner the better as various technological options are available like burning coal vs solar energy or one supplementing the other.  Whereas prevention of double spending and forcing honesty in block creation as an incentive for energy consuming miners but failure to provide an incentive for stake holders would hinder the expansion of peer to peer nodes that would have make any decentralized network operate at a higher quality.

Again, appreciate the input - but again, you give us nothing that anyone who reads these threads or can read on Wikipedia does not already know.  NOTHING happens over night, NOTHING happens without someone paying for it AND our recent history has proven that the GUN coin team is moving the coin in the right direction and getting things done. The coin is now a technologically current, stable, secure and safe crypto currency that firearms users can use to replace their merchant accounts.   If you think we are going to dump a years worth of work and blindly move the coin to PoS on a whim to satisfy the current fad, you are sadly mistaken.  You do not need to educated us or anyone else on PoS vs PoW, that is pointless.  Guncoin has a mission that I have stated over and over and over again that is NOT going to change.  While you make interesting generic comments, they have ZERO effect on our path forward for GUNCOIN as they offer no solutions, offers to help or anything but generic facts.  As far as providing incentive to stakeholders, there are plenty in my recent posts here and on Telegram to answer those questions.  

Not sure of the clarification of, something being interesting and generic at the same time nor how that works. Overall I was specific in terms of  stakeholders and node expansion idea. While clearing the smoke screens of mentioning of dubious source usage of Wikipedia to create an the insecure feeling of educating anyone on mining, in no ways there was an attempt to criticize the current course of the helm nor does anyone want years of hard work dumped based on any fashionable fad that's been around since 2012. Change of any kind NEVER is expected to happen overnight. Hard work and cost is understandable, as even with exchanges are now charging from half $1million to $7million to weed out listings of shit coins/ICOs. In what was thought to be an honest conversation from the very beginning, in the midst of irrelevant stupefaction feedback, I appreciate you finally hitting the GUN target and mentioning that these questions were already addressed and to reference their precepts on Telegram.