Quote from: anunymint on June 30, 2018, 05:46:04 AM

Quote from: babanana on June 30, 2018, 05:37:18 AM

Here we go again.If you want to be significant, make a pull request and not make your self another clown in here. I can smell your stink. You need glade too?

WTF does a pull request have to do with:

Quote from: anunymint on June 30, 2018, 05:13:39 AM

Correct! And that is real Bitcoin, not this Core scam altcoin shit. Again I have no objection to Core making a fork of Bitcoin or even a soft fork as they have done, but the scam part is they do not disclose the true security risks and just herd the n00bs into default wallet settings wherein the n00bs think they are hodling real Bitcoin but they are instead hodling a soft fork altcoin that can in the future be hardforked off of the real Bitcoin.

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on June 30, 2018, 05:37:23 AM

If you are going to be a bcash lol shill, at least be entertaining.

Are you readers so fucking deluded that you cannot see I have linked to the real Bitcoin which is version 0.5.4 of Satoshis protocol and I have stated now for the 6th time in this thread that I do not advocate big blocks nor any scammers who attempt to change (the game theory of) Satoshi's protocol and pretend it is real Bitcoin. That includes all the scammers, such as Roger Ver, Core, etc..

Altcoins are fractional reserves of real Bitcoin. Remember Greshams law. Altcoins will circulate, real Bitcoin will not.

Quote from: mymenace on June 30, 2018, 05:52:29 AM

Please explain how the bitcoin code base forked at 0.5.4 and who has been mining it

For the last time, the link for the detailed discussion is here. Those who care about not losing their real Bitcoin will expend the effort to read. Those who dont, wont. And that is the way it should be.

SegWit is a soft fork. All miners have continued mining 0.5.4 (at least until a Satoshi miner will take some SegWit donations then we will see which miners mine which hardfork as Core will be forced to hardfork off at that juncture). Read the detailed discussion to become informed. I will not spam this thread by recapitulating all those details in this thread.

May I STFU now without being incorrectly maligned?

Most ppl are running after ideals either posted in textbooks or casted from a real world down to a lower dimensional surface, because no brain ever would be capable of analyzing real world perfectly correct.

So in our real world we are damned to create and run after poor approaches to some ideals.
Our best approach is constantly creating, understanding, fixing, analysis, creating... at best in an open bootstrapping process to let Banach Fixpoint be found automatically, if existing (and we might have some local, wtf).

We have now BTC and BCH as two such major but dynamic approaches, and we might see others coming up, but that's unlikely IMO.

Nobody should be married with a single solution but always rethinking if one ore another approach is doing better and apply own PoW making it better.

Finally, if you want to do real good analysis of Bitcoin and it's embeddings, you need to do shitty complex stochastic process modeling in an open economic and financial network system , feel free of pointing me to such works, I m highly interested!

Even these works will undergo discussions and disputes ( complex stuff, university fighting) so I d not expect any final conclusion for the world accepted as truth soon.

For the time being, build stuff that works and prove things by simple bootstrapping, then Netscape and Altavista will be replaced by better solutions...