Precious metals are no longer a Schelling point because of the technology that governments have now, metals can no longer be moved without being confiscated. Gold and silver are under the control of nation-states, but Bitcoin has jurisdictional arbitrage and cant be controlled by any partial grouping of nation-states.
Once again you have gotten your facts 100% opposite of what they are in reality. It's ORDERS OF MAGNITUDE more cost effective to create and run a police state in cyberspace than in the physical world. So, no, metals are not at risk because nobody can afford to create a police state monitoring what everyone does in the physical plane, but they can easily do so for the digital one. You're using the govt's own infrastructure in the first place. Please do not try to pass off such statements that are laughable at face value as facts.
Shitcoins are the ones at risk due to having no valid Schelling point and ease of govt clamp down, not metals. If the govt attempts to outlaw silver and gold, they do not cease to exist. They still exist and have value. Since shitcoins have no intrinsic use or value, a govt clampdown destroys them. They're completely worthless. And yes, Kaczynski was right no matter how much you attempt to pretend he was not. The most oppresive forms of tyranny will manifest from the digital plane, not the physical one, due to the cheaper cost and ease of creating and running those systems as I mentioned above.
Only a complete fool would embrace these digital slave systems over sound money - physical silver and gold.
Gov are provenly good clampingdown physical ownerships. No chances for any PM here. Shop owners are at risk.
Its harder or impossible to clampdown IP or virtual bearer instruments. Use Bitcoin and brainwallets, how is that stoppable better than PM?