Quote from: JayJuanGee on July 01, 2018, 08:06:57 PM

Quote from: mindrust on July 01, 2018, 12:20:05 PM

Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion is not the true vision of infofront.

infofront's true vision wouldn't let trolls to hijack this thread so easily. If this shit keeps happening, I'll have no choice but to fork this thread and start it again as it meant to be.

The new W/O thread will be ripped off from any troll protocols (like anonymint, roach, jbeher and other retards) and only infofront's true protocol to be left.

Raise hands now.

P.S: I won't be reverting your past crap. Your past messages (troll or not) will be safe. I'll copy everything from this topic one by one but (tr00) moderation will be taking place by the page 20781.

Even though your post comes off as a bit of a seeming joke, I get the sense that you are serious.

Don't get me wrong. I am fairly critical of infofront's latest announcement that he is following the segwit skeptical ideas of folks like anunymint with a decent portion of his storage bitcoins by keeping them in legacy addresses.... so yeah, seems like bullshit to do it and like bullshit to announce that you are doing it in favor of what some of the trolls, shills and bitcoin attackers want peeps to do.

So, yeah there can be some issues with his tolerance of some of the ideas of seemingly obvious troll/shills like anonymint, roach, jbreher, who seem to go beyond with their presentations of what seems to be disinformation. So, yeah, even though each of us might, from time to time, draw the line more strictly than infofront, there is way too insufficient of evidence to suggest that he has either sold out too trolls or that overall his discretion has gone beyond the pale by allowing a decent amount of the posts of these trolls.

I think that overall, we cannot let the "perfect" be the enemy of the good, and on balance infofront continues to establish decently sufficient discretion with his moderation and life/time balances. Also, I don't think that he manipulated the self-critical poll that overwhelmingly showed that WO participants remain content with his strike of balance. Further, I cannot recall if you ran for "ownership of the WO thread", but the votes were overwhelming in favor of Infofront, and even if we were to conduct a thread ownership change vote again today (assuming that theymos et al would even be receptive to such a change) or in the near future, it remains strongly likely that the vast overwhelming majority of eligible voters would support infofront...

Go ahead, Mindrust, see if you can garner support for a WO 2.0 thread. I would likely participate in such thread, just to see how it goes (because in theory it is not a bad idea, and your intentions seem good), but I doubt that even your more strict troll-booting strategy would result in a better WO thread that also allows for a diverse set of ideas that weigh on the side of allowing discourse (even some trolling and shills, as long as they can present substantive points), as Infofront's ongoing approach seems to accomplish a decent balance.

Furthermore, network effects? It could take a few years to accomplish any kind of following within a WO 2.0 thread, that is assuming that you would be able to gain momentum in that direction.. good luck. Wink

Quote from: anunymint on July 01, 2018, 12:36:55 PM

About 3 hours ago I messaged infofront to tell him I have left this thread.

Yeah right! Take this "promise" with a BIG ass grain of salt. Trolls/shills make these kinds of going away promises all the time, but they tend to last for years and come back from time to time to clarify and "enlighten" the rest of us to their doom and gloom bullshit, and new revelations that they have discovered within their tend to be small, smarter than the rest of us brains.

the plan to use segwit coin while keeping real bitcoin to fork is smart... it was explained a few post earlier.

wrong, perfect is the only path against the leeches, scamers and all their cohort of minion who have for centuries enslaved mankind.