Quote from: aliashraf on July 02, 2018, 12:10:48 AM

Dude, these ideas are too divergent to be discussed in a crypto forum, don't you get it? Aren't you smart enough to understand your divergence and find a community with a more similar discourse with yours and run your campaign there?

Bitcoin is about decentralization and bitcointalk is a place to discuss how we can achieve this goal. We have hard times and a long road ahead? No worries, we try more and take our shot. Is it that hard to understand?

You can not find solutions if you don't study every problem deeply. But of course this talk is more political than technical. I hope anunymint explained his point of view, and if you think evil, it is not so absurd.
That's an old discussion between capitalists and socialists. Anunymint is talking like a socialist trying to discredit the austrian school. I'm still at an early stage in studying that so I try to not comment about that.
For general culture I will leave a link:
https://mises.org/library/myth-natural-monopoly

Quote from: anunymint on July 02, 2018, 12:03:51 AM

If you mean that Satoshi miners will compete with each other to mine the donations by rewinding each others chains, yeah I agree that might be possible if the hashrate is too low. But a decent amount (e.g. 20%) much lower than 50% will be enough to cause other miners to want to join that chain and not fight it, because for example how many miners have 20% of the hashrate. Thus a Schelling point forms and that 10% or 20% quickly swells and becomes irreversible.

We know who that large miner will be: Bitmain.

I'm not sure about this, as you say miners talk privately, and I don't think they will like if only Bitmain will keep all the booty.