Quote from: DrDolittle on July 02, 2018, 08:51:02 AM

Quote from: krzysiekj on July 01, 2018, 07:13:14 PM

In the latter case, the fact that obtaining Ercoin via burning will also mean obtaining Blacknet and vice versa may mean that more people in total will hold both currencies, which may result in greater adoption. On the other hand, if people are not allowed to choose between the two currencies, then it may form an incentive to not purchase BlackCoin at all, wait until the launch of the currency theyre interested in and purchase it on an exchange. In particular it may therefore result in a lower value of BLK burnt/snapshotted and therefore lower perceived value of both currencies.

Merged burning (allowing the same burned BLKs to participate both in Blacknet and Ercoin distribution) may form an interesting marketing opportunity, but so may another alternatives.

Weighing the pros and cons above, Im currently leaning toward 1 blackcoin = 1 blacknet or 1 ercoin.

I think the market showed that it's ready to abuse all three projects if we go for 1 blackcoin = 1 blackcoin + 1 blacknet + 1 ercoin.
So, explicit choice via burning seems to be the most fair option.

Personally I think BLK snapshot for Blacknet then burning of either Blacknet / Blackcoin for Ercoin is better, depending on timelines.