Quote from: raddish on July 03, 2018, 03:05:35 AM

Quote from: Shadovka on July 02, 2018, 04:39:41 AM

Quote from: raddish on July 02, 2018, 03:54:25 AM

Quote from: Shadovka on July 02, 2018, 03:33:00 AM

Quote from: raddish on July 02, 2018, 02:44:57 AM

Quote from: Shadovka on July 02, 2018, 02:32:25 AM

Quote from: raddish on July 02, 2018, 01:50:10 AM

Quote from: Shadovka on July 02, 2018, 01:15:53 AM

Quote from: raddish on July 01, 2018, 11:55:25 AM

Quote from: forestharvest on July 01, 2018, 11:03:02 AM

Quote from: raddish on July 01, 2018, 10:51:36 AM

Quote from: forestharvest on July 01, 2018, 04:22:34 AM

Quote from: raddish on July 01, 2018, 03:02:15 AM

Quote from: Shadovka on July 01, 2018, 01:35:32 AM

Quote from: raddish on June 30, 2018, 08:55:45 AM

Quote from: Shadovka on June 30, 2018, 06:11:13 AM

Quote from: raddish on June 30, 2018, 04:44:20 AM

Shadovka and forestharvest pardon me for adding in my own opinions, from what i see the discussion between both of you is just what this ICO project can and able to do have you all think of things like security to the wallet coins, how is the data of the user being collect, storage and use, as in the recent years personal data is a topic most of the people are very concern about.

Indeed what you point out is an important aspect to attract investors and potential investors, i am quite sure that this ICO will not miss out the security area, which can be considerable factor for the survival of this particular ICO.

Since you are touching on attracting investors, what do you think are the crucial points that can help this ICO to attract more investors and creating more awareness to the crypto users to let them know the existence of this amazing ICO?

forestharvest have given an answer similar to what i wanted to express. However i still got some add on to it, normally investors will look at the team involve in the whole ICO and the usefulness of the product whether it is needed or not needed. As most investors come with capital and the simplest thing is like what forestharvest say which is security without it everything is futile.

Great for your personal view points on a good ICO which aspect of this project does it attract you the most?

I am not really attract to this idea at first but after i read up at the first page i find that there is endless of possibilities that this platform is able to bring to the users and there is no fees and middleman involve which is a thing i like for transaction as it is time consuming and mostly we are just paying for something which we can do on our own, why do we need to pay people if we are willing and able to do the job on our own and the fees can be horrible just by doing a simple thing.

I suppose you have some bad experience before regarding "fees and middleman transaction before"?

Not really my experience though this is my what my friend had been through, i won't want to expose which platform is it but just to point out that this project do help solve this problem.

Even though you are not the victim of this bad experience, but i still feel sorry for your friend regarding his case and i am quite certain that youwill be a happy user for this app from what you have say before.

Oh i see our friend had encounter this type of problems before this platform will most probably fit him as the root of the problems are being eliminated in the platform.

I also feel sad for his friend but well life has to go on, do you think meritt protocol result will be adversely affect by the current bear trend market?

What i believe is that the current bear market is due to many scams involve in crypto once this problem is solve crypto will automatically rise back to his original value or higher, meritt protocol should not be affected by it.

Do you think in long term wise meritt protocol can be a scam in crypto market also?

From my earlier post i mention that this platform allowed big or small scale projects to be listed on the platform, which is a good thing but because of this low barriers entry scammers can make use of this platform too, for now i does not know how will the ICO react to this problem and the solution to it though.

Do you think this problem can be solve by KYC which all the ICO is using for the tokens buyer of their ICO.

KYC definitely have the effect of reducing and lower the scam rate, however if we look at the bigger picture if a person that going to do some snobbish thing or scamming there are many ways to do it, KYC documents is only able to act as the first level of security.

From what you say can i assume that you have your own ideas on this?

I will not say i have an idea on this particular issues though. I do have some opinions on this like ICO uses KYC people can buy KYC documents easily, even tagging of ip address they can use another ip address to register. So to me is you can do the have your strategy but the solutions of solving the problem always exist, the only way is only to reduce.