Quote from: georgem on July 04, 2018, 01:03:37 AM

Quote from: SimpleMan on July 03, 2018, 09:33:26 PM

@georgem you are making an honest statement at the beginning of this thread, but if it's known that these risks exist wouldn't it even be better to quit this project? Are you still working on this?

Yes, of course I am.
Spreadcoin has grown on me, and I will never abandon it.
Why give up a coin with high hashrate, bittrex listing, unique tech (we are the inventors of POK - proof of knowledge), etc ?

Don't worry, I will rephrase the warning at page 1, and put it someplace else.
There are better ways of expressing what I want to say, and not as "in your face" as I did so far. Grin

Basically we need to inform people that...

1) the original developer has left in 2015
2) this led to a centralization of the coin supply
3) which in turn escalated into HELIUM in 2017.

We don't need to hash and rehash 3) over and over again, I am ready to put this controversy to rest.
(Not changing my opinion though, just switching focus completely)

By now the coin distribution has normalized, the market has relaxed and found a reasonable equilibrium and price level.

Everything makes more sense now.

So.... I have lots of open threads and experiments here, and I will have to start somewhere and in small steps, dissect everything and try to find a decent rhythm of contribution...

Stay tuned!

Ok although I wonder how someone can say for sure that the distribution has normalized. You actually never know whether the old dev sold or not. Nonetheless I think keeping this alive with all the advantages like Bittrex listing is a good idea.