Quote from: WaffleMaster on July 08, 2018, 05:01:07 PM

General opinion of what?

That it is a serious indicator of fraud, if a business owner lies/presents "alternative" facts.

Quote from: WaffleMaster on July 08, 2018, 05:01:07 PM

The example you cherry picked is completely irrelevant as we're talking about facts vs fiction. Wire fraud vs some guy who wants to look oldschool.

"cherry picked" makes it sound like i chose this case out of several, for its specific benefits to my argument. That is untrue, it is in fact the only such case i know of. Nonetheless, the sentiment was clear.

I did not know of any wire fraud though, i haven't bothered studying the incident.

You mentioning wire fraud, but omitting document forgery/impersonation is something i don't get.

Quote from: WaffleMaster on July 08, 2018, 05:01:07 PM

I respect that you think you know everything and that your assumptions are correct, but I'd definitely argue that the general opinion here is that you have absolutely no idea what he wants to do by proving he is oldschool into Bitcoin.

Now who is flaming? Kiss

edit:

Just remembered the arbitao signature campaign was stopped by the manager after users pointed out that old images (big ben not in scaffold) was presented as if they were taken in a period where big ben was scaffolded.