Quote from: zycast on July 10, 2018, 01:37:05 PM

Quote from: TrainDING on July 08, 2018, 06:59:00 PM

Quote from: nasoflo on July 08, 2018, 05:33:41 PM

Quote from: BitDane on July 07, 2018, 07:07:01 PM

Quote from: smith4cris on July 06, 2018, 11:16:14 PM

Quote from: sonjay22 on July 06, 2018, 10:24:18 PM

Quote from: TrainDING on July 05, 2018, 07:17:49 PM

Quote from: zycast on July 05, 2018, 05:39:32 PM

Quote from: sonjay22 on July 01, 2018, 01:33:38 PM

Quote from: cryp24x on June 29, 2018, 07:49:18 PM

Quote from: micahyahel10 on June 23, 2018, 09:30:42 PM

Quote from: Rapha-EL on June 14, 2018, 07:37:26 PM

Fair Ninja will provide the best possible user rating system. Buyers and sellers will be able to rate each other based on their experience.

Isn't it wonderful guys? The sellers who have higher ratings will likely to have more costumers since they have been trusted and proven to be trustworthy so sellers who have a very good experience with them can also refer them to their friends and also buyers having very good trust rate will also be trusted by more sellers.

Because of that rating system, you can identify even the buyers, if they are bogus or not. Or sometimes, there are buyers that are hard to please or having a lot of unreasonable complains. In the case, of second hand items, you should not expect too much because it is not brand new. As long as they are stating the real condition of the said item.

There are second-hand items that are really in good condition. I think Fair Ninja will evaluate which items can seller sell on the platform. The good thing about the platform is that you can reject an item that is not in good condition. And you Smart Contract will not release the payment unless the buyer confirmed that the item is acceptable.

How fair ninja can evaluate those second hand items personally, and if that so maybe the process of selling items here will be long since fair ninja need to evaluate it one by one!?

I think that will be a big problem because the fairninja platform won't be able to evaluate every singke item that the people are selling and even if they could, it would mean higher fees and longer process which will take up a very huge amount of time. I think the only solution for this is the rating of the seller which can help a bit to show how credible the seller really is. That's the only way I can think of. Unless they get authorities involved which is something that I really can't see happening. I hope the fair ninja team can be able to explain how they would react to this problem...

I think yes. It is the rating and reviews of the seller will be our basis to evaluate whether the seller is a good one or not. Fair Ninja was powered by Blockchain Technology and I think it is really an advantage to use it for reviews and ratings because the ratings and reviews given by the buyer will not be manipulated by anyone on the platform.

Yes fair ninja could look at it to check the background of the seller and the history of their transactions before but i think not all the time and the items of the seller is different case!? What if sellers have high ratings but selling fake items, but maybe fair ninja has a fair solution for this to the benifit's this project and both buyers and sellers goodluck...

When you say fake items are you pertaining to imitation items? Surely more and more people are buying imitation products since they can't afford the original one. I am not quite sure if Fair Ninja can regulate this. However, buyers will have a choice if they wish to return the item when they see it as an imitation product.

For me, I don't think Fair Ninja will tolerate it on the platform. Fake items are illegal which can be checked by the government agency that was tasked to monitor fake/imitation/class-A items. I believe that most of the consumers don't want a fake one when they can have original items at a lower price which is better.

Of course. What kind of developers allow people who break rules to stay in their platform? But that thing is, even if they don't like it, they can't track every single one of the sellers and buyers in this platform even more when the numbers increase so much. The only thing that can be done is to ask people to report the seller who sold fake stuff and then get him banned by the developers of the latform. But, blocking or banning must also be done after a deep investigation has been done and the accuser or the one being accused is the one guikty or not or if one of the two is just taking advantage of the situation and his rights as a buyer or seller.

I know that it is quite hard to track down every single transaction on the platform but what I am thinking is that how Facebook track down some of the explicit or malicious posts. There are report functions that Facebook attached to the system but they can also program the platform to filter every conversation or post which will find keywords. I will not underestimate Technology in terms of algorithms, I know Fair Ninja can do it. Better safe than be banned forever.

Hmm.. I kinda like the idea.. if this gets implemented, then we can be sure that fhere will be no malicious transactions or deals that will be happening in the fair ninja platform. But the problem is, it would be hard if the AI or bot relied only on keywords because keywords alone do not bring full thought. If people get used to the keywords, they can use different ways and different words just to dodge the bot while still being abke to deliver what they wanna say or talk about..

Direct selling is not a new concept,
Directly connecting the buyer and seller reduces the transaction costs
but executing it on a large scale in a many-to-many peer model
without the need for a central system or authority is a big leap.