-snip-
Yes, but I think we need to learn everything from the beginning, because when we study history at school, we are taught it not from the year when we were born, but the whole story from the beginning to our days. Unfortunately, I do not have an economic education, so I'll try to understand it here, and I'll probably help newbie.
Yes, but I think we need to learn everything from the beginning, because when we study history at school, we are taught it not from the year when we were born, but the whole story from the beginning to our days. Unfortunately, I do not have an economic education, so I'll try to understand it here, and I'll probably help newbie.
Your analogy, I think is not quite correct. Learning the history and economy is different, they have different subjects to discuss and different methods to learn. I appreciate your spirit and willingness to learn economy, and I don't think learning about the traditional economy is still bad, 'cause the principal still stays the same. Currencies/cryptocurrencies are just a small portion of the economic spaces.
In fact, there are many economic principles which can be put to use and applied with cryptocurrencies. Whether traditional or historical, an economy will continously have the same principles regardless of time. This is why its best to study about the economy even if you think that cryptocurrencies are totally different. History is an entirely different concept, but its worthy to study the history of economics otherwise.