Quote from: SandraStark on July 10, 2018, 11:38:16 PM

Quote from: wojteks102 on July 10, 2018, 06:14:43 PM

Quote from: hunnykaushal on June 28, 2018, 07:40:44 AM

Quote from: verita1 on June 17, 2018, 04:07:16 AM

Quote from: wwzsocki on June 14, 2018, 04:09:46 PM

This case is complicated. First of all, I don't understand why any project hires member with a reputation like Jamal has for a bounty management. This is like asking for trouble or they did it on purpose. Tokenpay hired Jamal because it is easy to accuse him of scam because of his bad reputation. I don't know if this is the case but looks like. I have few questions to better understand this situation.

Why such a big project like Tokenpay hire member with such a bad reputation?
Why bounty hunters join such a bounty campaign managed by an untrusted member?
Why there is no other scam thread started by united bounty hunters against Tokenpay?
Why didn't they pay to bounty hunters if Jamal is a scammer? What is the exact explanation?
Why bounty hunters don't look for help by BTT staff or established high rank members?

Thank you, for your good sense I am one of the affected bounty hunters. The TokenPay Bounty campaign was my second bounty I had no experience, nor what it meant to join a Bounty campaign led by a Bounty manager with "bad reputation".

Until May 1, I had hope of receiving my reward because I received an email from TokenPay indicating that they would take control to give us our TPAY. And on May 23 I learned from one of the TokenPay administrators on Telegram that we would not receive the reward according to this message from the Administrators.
We were denied many times that we did not ask about bounty because we would be banned. And since then we have not had advances. Only this thread to demonstrate our discontent.

If they already detect that 90% of accounts belong to jamal , then why they are not paying remaining 10% people ? Tokenpay team is lying as per me.

Moreover if they think 90% accounts belongs to him, why don't they ask for KYC to bounty hunters ?

I asked about the same thing already here in the thread but.. no answer. Somebody signalized that they might not pay that 10% people because of too many negative comments about the project in that thread, but for me it is highly unlikely - if they want to pay, why just not pay and roll out further the project.

In May, the Tokenpay team stated that they found 70% of fake accounts)) I look, for the time that I do not follow the project, the number has grown from 70% to 90%)) Well done! Cool! This is an indicator of your prestige! I wonder what kind of feedback the team wanted if they behaved improperly? People worked for you in your bounty. And no matter how it happened (the fraudulent actions of the manager) the work was done and you got fame! The team simply could take a spreadsheet and ask everyone to pass KYC ! In my opinion, scammers will be eliminated immediately! What is so difficult about this? Huh

But, as we see, for the team, money is more important than respect for people, prestige and reputation.

KYC will be best for this. Yeah, but for me there must be a reason to not doing that - bounty tokens/coins may be already burned or distributed through some people don't know even which ones.