Quote from: BinPooool on July 12, 2018, 03:08:02 PM

Quote from: Sithcs on July 12, 2018, 03:03:42 PM

Quote from: BinPooool on July 12, 2018, 02:51:36 PM

Quote from: TIXON9I on July 12, 2018, 02:48:24 PM

Quote from: KarambaCoin on July 12, 2018, 02:45:19 PM

Quote from: TIXON9I on July 12, 2018, 02:41:55 PM

Quote from: KarambaCoin on July 12, 2018, 02:37:05 PM

Do you think that someone is interested in your opinion? ) I see that the team pays little attention to ANN

In the morning I saw a message from the team. By the way, a good team should deal with product development, not with conversations.

I wanted to tell you that the team has already most of all thought out and the votes will be distributed in such a way as to exclude manipulation of the voting results. Therefore, I suggest waiting for the announcement from the team on this issue.

Well, if everything is exactly as you say.... I just drew attention to this question, so that afterwards there would be no problems.

I hope that there will be no problems. Manipulation by voting will allow to include in the network not reliable nodes, which will damage the image of the project.

In what do you think will manifest their insecurity? How will the nodes be selected? By what criteria?

Each elected IPFS-host-node will receive monthly salary for maintaining the storage. If one of the nodes does not work correctly, fails to provide a file or maintains a bad connection, then another node can be elected to replace it.
IPFS-host-nodes can receive different salaries depending on the quality, volume of their storage and statistics of processed requests.

Thanks I got it. If there is an opportunity to manipulate the vote, then the nodes of the inadequate configuration can be selected.