Quote from: Sylook on December 30, 2013, 06:06:29 AM

Although I like the name ''Omniwallet'' (which will be called the ''Omni'', heh a few people might get the reference...) as a Marketing professional I would say that Richard is right and made a couple of great suggestions. I vote for E-Wallet.

Quote from: empoweoqwj on December 30, 2013, 06:21:28 AM

E-Wallet sounds too generic too me. Might even be in use and / or TM'd.

Anyway, you just need a working title for now. You can brainstorm the final name once the software is nearly ready.

Yeah for now it'll be Uniwallet I think. In my opinion E-wallet sounds too generic while Uniwallet describes simply what the product does.

------- IMPORTANT MESSAGE -------
Let's start a brainstorm on the biggest problem faced by the application: gestion of the subwallets, or "how will the application handle the transactions".

These are the options for now (subject to change with the community's input):

bitcoind, litecoind, etc. are downloaded directly on the computer. Disadvantages:
- we need to support at least 3 versions of the [alt]coind software, one for each major OS
bitcoind, litecoind, etc. are on a remote server and we use the Raw Transactions API (https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Raw_Transactions). Disavantages:
- users have no control over what software version they use, and if one version is infected, every user's transactions will pass by an infected software
- if the server is down, then Uniwallet is down also
allow a system of plugins. Makers of the altcoins would have to build a plugin for Uniwallet for the users to download instead of downloading the whole Qt wallet. Disavantages:
- defeats the purpose of Uniwallet a little bit
- lots of code duplication and gestion for the devs

What do you think? If your input is important on other points of the software like the name, it's extremely important that you give me suggestions concerning this particular point!
Thank you, and keep rocking!