Quote from: Yashnik on July 14, 2018, 08:51:53 PM

I think you have it wrong. it's 210,9 I am questioning. Are you working on a Windows miner that supports 210,9?

Yeah, it wasn't anyone posting here that "got it wrong" except maybe you:

Quote from: Yashnik on July 14, 2018, 04:39:14 PM

You say "* Solver for equihash 200,9 has been deleted." and "I'll probably return 200,9 variant later"

Can you confirm that you are working on a Windows miner for 200,9?

People can only go by the info you give them and not read your mind.