Quote from: Bargraphics on December 30, 2013, 03:03:31 PM

Quote from: RoadStress on December 30, 2013, 02:43:22 PM

Quote from: Bargraphics on December 29, 2013, 11:20:20 PM

Quote from: RoadStress on December 29, 2013, 03:13:52 PM

I was the only one crying "scam" and "con". RickJamesBTC and Entropy-uc didn't

Quote from: RickJamesBTC on December 29, 2013, 05:02:45 PM

ALL I SEE IS SCAM. you want me to say scam, there it is

Quote from: Entropy-uc on December 23, 2013, 03:19:46 PM

I wouldn't touch this scam with a ten foot pole.

Again you are incorrect RoadStress.

I'm not saying that they won't have chips soon, i'm just asking for some reasons for their success except NDA and naked assembly benches.

I try to cut the garbage out of your posts so I apologize for not quoting you fully.

I think we are in agreement here. I'm not saying they will have chips soon or at all. I'm simply stating that with the knowledge presented it is likely that they will. You and RickJamesBTC seems to like to see me repeat myself. We already had this conversation in the other thread which I already quoted on this one. There's certain timelines in the IC world that are "usual". There are certain delays that are "usual". If you take both of them and also take the timeline that was given by the owner of the company then you would come to the same conclusion. If this company isn't a total scam then they should have chips relatively soon (Read: within a month to two months) because of their admitted delays.

It's up to you and anyone else that is interested in this company (if you are not interested in the company then why even ask these questions..) to decide if the information given is enough to trust the company. Obviously for you personally it is not and I can respect that. Just like RickJamesBTC you want to see an actual chip unfortunately that cannot happen until it is manufactured (Another point I already quoted in this thread from the other thread).

So now here we are guys.

You have all the facts presented to you regardless if you want to read them or not.
You still choose to want to see a working product which means you have to wait until end of January/February.
If you choose not to wait then there's nothing left to say here, you guys will keep screaming scam until then and there's nothing I can do because that is your opinion and for all I know might be correct.

Well i thought that the "usual" delays have already been passed, but it's up to yourself to admit that or not.

And i will say this again. Posting as proof a fact that happened after your statement seems just wicked. You can't present 3 proofs of people that said "scam" when at the time of your statement there were only 2 people. Stop misleading readers.