Incorrect. This is not criminal case. The burden of proof is on you to convince we the users that your anonymous Staff is not corrupt when in fact you allowed @stereotype to attack my children and all sorts of other insane accusations and only deleted words from my posts.
The circumstantial evidence is compelling in my opinion and I think also will be compelling in the opinion of others who matter (who bother to actually go click the links and read the evidence).
Your presumption when you come up with a theory is that you're right and that anyone who opposes you should prove you wrong. Which is awfully similar to the Argument from ignorance fallacy (
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_ignorance). Since you don't mind repeating yourself, I'll repeat what I've said: I don't have to disprove your conspiracy theories, especially the ones that are completely based on timing and your personal dislike for me.
Fact is you allowed @stereotype make insane accusations about my minor children and other insane accusations, while you deleted words from my posts that were responding to his posts.
So clearly you were aware of the insane incivility and clearly you allowed it to escalate. Then
you blame me when I fight back because you didnt do your job well as a moderator.
How is that a fallacy? It is a fact.
(and it will do you no good to attempt to hide your tracks now, as I have archived everything already)
Again you seem to not understand my point. This is not a criminal court. This is a market and if the market loses confidence in you, then you lose.
And you already know you are losing because all of the engineers and wealthy have left
bitcointalk.org.
Because you allow insanity to reign.
Unless they were threats of bodily harm
If that is the only form of moderation you are going to do, then you will have a clusterfuck of insane incivility. So why are
you pissed off at me for being uncivil when you foster such an environment? i was just responding to the venom that you failed to moderate.
Now you are contradicting yourself. You claim that I am banned for being disruptive and now you state that you do not moderate anything but threats of bodily harm. So which is it? You can not have it both ways.
This is why I am planning to create a decentralized moderation forum, because it is very difficult to have both freedom and civility. The only way I can see to achieve it is with decentralized moderation. Yet
you ridiculed my idea.
... are you kidding me?
I am not a liar. Ask @theymos. Hopefully he remembers.
if all of this stemmed from a single account being willingly disabled then mistook for a ban (thus prompting mods who handled later situations (the last of who AFAIK is me) to interpret your participation on the forum as a ban), you should immediately PM theymos to have it resolved and your bans absolved. Hell, CC me in the PM and I'll forward it.
I can hardly remember what happened in 2015, 2016, and 2017. I was so delirious fighting that illness. I really do not know what happened.
I was fighting for my life. I was in a fight-or-flight cortisol mode trying to stay alive.
I really do not want to come back and fight all the trolling. If the moderation policy is somehow improved, maybe I might want to come back.
I can code now, so I really do not need to be here. I have something else I can do, now that I am not so sick as I was. But I wish there was a place to have no trolling allowed discussion about crypto.
I wish you would create a new subforum that has a very strict policy of moderation. No sarcasm allowed!
Actually I still think the decentralized moderation is the only way to make it work so each of us can choose our own moderators. The moderated thread idea sort of works but the problem is for example I did not start the Bitcoin Killer thread which is about me. Also people do not like to participate in moderated threads because it gives too much power to one person. I would prefer that each of us be able to select a moderator of our individual choosing for each thread.
P.S. I have just now linked from my blog to this the 2nd page of this thread. I am for 100% transparency.