Fact is you allowed @stereotype make insane accusations about my minor children and other insane accusations, while you deleted words from my posts that were responding to his posts.
So clearly you were aware of the insane incivility and clearly you allowed it to escalate.Then you blame me when I fight back because you didnt do your job well as a moderator.
How is that a fallacy? It is a fact.
(and it will do you no good to attempt to hide your tracks now, as I have archived everything already)
Again you seem to not understand my point. This is not a criminal court. This is a market and if the market loses confidence in you, then you lose.
And you already know you are losing because all of the engineers and wealthy have left bitcointalk.org.
Because you allow insanity to reign.
If you're referring to your iamnotback account, I was merging your consecutively posted posts into a single one, editing in notes to every deleted post that informed the user of said posts being merged. Didn't really require me to read the discussion. You can check (
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=851556;sa=showPosts) which posts were merged since I used the [hr] tag (line) to separate the content.
It was that or deleting quoted reposts.
If that is the only form of moderation you are going to do, then you will have a clusterfuck of insane incivility. So why are
you pissed off at me for being uncivil when you foster such an environment? i was just responding to the venom that you failed to moderate.
Now you are contradicting yourself. You claim that I am banned for being disruptive and now you state that you do not moderate anything but threats of bodily harm. So which is it? You can not have it both ways.
This is why I am planning to create a decentralized moderation forum, because it is very difficult to have both freedom and civility. The only way I can see to achieve it is with decentralized moderation. Yet
you ridiculed my idea.
You were banned for ban evading and, if theymos isn't wrong, repeated multi-posting. The only bans I personally issued (last 2? 3? not sure) were for ban evasion on a few of your latest alts.
As for your idea, I did not ridicule it. I criticized your idea and ridiculed you for IMO your absolutely awful character traits. One of which is your continued claims that your idea
will (not might) replace centralized discussion forums while nothing of the sort seems to be happening. If decentralized forums take off, great, seems like something really interesting. It's just that I'm generally disillusioned with the general public's ability to sacrifice even a bit of convenience.
I am not a liar. Ask @theymos. Hopefully he remembers.
Pinged theymos about it via PM.
I wish you would create a new subforum that has a very strict policy of moderation. No sarcasm allowed!
I think you are greatly overestimating as to what info I have access to and what I can actually do. Only admins can create new boards.