Quote from: clip123 on July 16, 2018, 10:47:21 PM

Quote from: borderline on July 16, 2018, 09:19:17 AM

Quote from: Semen222 on July 16, 2018, 08:59:08 AM

Quote from: beeelzebub on July 16, 2018, 08:06:46 AM

Quote from: lyubomyr on July 15, 2018, 06:07:14 PM

Quote from: beeelzebub on July 15, 2018, 05:32:06 PM

We really need a new Exchange.

No-one wants to buy on stocks.exchange, people only go there to dump. So price is bleeding.

The only good thing is, it is a good opportunity to buy cheap.

It will be a huge project no matter on what exchange it is

I agree but i don't like loosing Money constantly.

If something urgent came up and i have to sell some semux, i am doomed because of lack of Exchange.

I am in this long term but still, we need way better Exchange.

What will the new exchanger give? Why arrange a pampa coin, which has great potential? In fact, I am satisfied with the current state of affairs. The main thing is that the work is being done, and not how much the coin is worth at the moment.

new and bigger exchange means more advertise for the project, maybe a grow of the price more investor in, more daily volume and maybe we can reack the 100k dollar for will be listed on coinmarkecap.. people don't undertand the opportunity of semux and this is just the economic side, voting the pools you can earn 3.3% monthly 39% yearly..

I agree more exchanges will prevent single point of failure. IE if exchange goes out of business.

Plus we will have more options and more visibility and hopefully more trading.

Yes, exchanges are important but Semux is strong despite the current exchange situation. There are pros and cons to having listed on one exchange. On the good side, it adds some degree of security and protection from those who have tried to impersonate escrow services in the discord channel and maybe other social sites. On the downside, having only one exchange limits opportunity for volume as well as market stabilization through arbitrage trading.

Maybe there was some pressure on Semux to get listed on to at least some exchange and so they obliged.

I think it will be fine. It is also reasonable to expect that Semux could have easily accumulated funds to list on several exchanges during the OTC grey-markets trading days. I'm sure several bitcoins worth were traded then. Given that, it makes me think Semux has there reasons for only listing on stocks.exchange. Maybe this was to simply provide an option while it could be financially smarter to focus funds to a larger online platform.

Personally, stocks.exchange seems reputable. They have been reliable but slow at times but that can be said for various coin networks so it's not always the exchange with the problem.

It is also very likely that those behind Semux are not as concerned with exchanges as the are with critical development elements. Again, this is good and bad. But if this is the situation I would highly recommend more investment of time/money/resources into marketing and exchange strategies because this can also be crucial to aiding further development efforts.