Quote from: bartekhl_2 on July 18, 2018, 09:54:26 AM

Quote from: X3nd3r on July 15, 2018, 02:53:52 PM

How is a manager going to effectively motivate a group of developers and engineers that are doing work for free most of the time?
Sounds like you really just want a single person to be the FACE(Steve Jobs type) of BitcoinZ for marketing purposes which seems wrong for a coin that has privacy built into it and against my idea of decentralization. I voted NO for your tweet when I came across the link on here.
Can you come up with an idea that is not centralized and controlling like the one you are proposing.

At first - thank you for pointing the discussion to the proposal. I would like you to go a bit deeper in the scheme frame I am proposing.

The person representing the community should be elected for term cadency(2years?), and by voting amongst people that decided to propose their way for the coin to the community. This is our job to make this position as much requiring as it would give self-realizing for the person willing to take up this challenge. As for me - this is not a job to do after hours. Several thousands members of the community need more time. This is serious task and should come with a potential reward. I really am convinced there is no free work. But there is a potential here for the community to accept or not every agreement.

Also please stay realistic. We are not that revolutionary as Apple nor Litecoin. There is no place in here for a remarkable icon as Steve Jobs. There is a place for a person that would bring up all the pieces together and represent the community to the outside world. We already had issues about big investor who was willing to help us but never sat to the table because none of devs was officially representing the coin.
At last - the voting should decide whose vision is to be implemented.

Analysing my proposition you should see that in fact I am against any form of dictatorship and ruling of just one person. The above system is about to give the community the foundations of an advanced form of Network Democracy where the people have control over who represents them and who leads and schedules the main processes.

I think you are on the right track and your recommendations appear useful. You should post them as proposals in the right place and correct format on BTCZ.rocks forum.

I also think you have lost much credibility due to your attitude and tone towards this community. We are a great group of people and while we may not be able to beat Steve Jobs, we will for SURE beat some dead old coins such as DGB in marketcap over the next four years. So brace yourself for the ride and be an active part of the community and follow the rules established by those who have been here a lot longer than you (the original dev team) and those who have probably lost a lot more than you (like me) and look forward to a brighter better future. We knocked off the ASICs and that is great. We had the devs show up and do an introductory youtube video introducing themselves, that is awesome and adds credibility to the project. We should now see a lot of positives come to this project after this.