Quote from: DogBert on July 20, 2018, 06:31:27 AM

Quote from: CaptDero on July 20, 2018, 01:24:24 AM

Hello @Serena,
My first reply to you since you left.
I believe you have contributed lots of efforts and time for the DERO Community. Thanks for that.
For me you are still the same kind and sweet person. Pls don't allow this incident to affect you any way.
Let the good and positive in you be more powerful. I have seen and handle lots of such in life, thanks to the teacher called Experience.
You will always have my good wishes. Feel free for anything else.

Thanks.

Regards.

I hope you change your mind about the community. My experience here taught me many lessons, and some particularly harsh ones about trust.

a few things I've noticed

Topoheight DIFFERENCE - Sample #1 additional data Height: 249380 -VS- Topoheight: 322904 ----- with the original blocks removed we get --- Height: 153,830 -VS- Topoheight: 227,354 for a block emission rate of 147.79561854% topoheight -VS- blockheight. This means DERO is generating 47.79561854% side blocks but Capt stated they expect 10% to 15% side blocks.

(1) A cursory glance suggests that Dero is putting out around 32% - 37% -or- 3.186x to 4.779x more side blocks than expected while simultaneously maintaining a lower emission rate than Monero had at this time (18,620.62 Monero mined on day 225). Math - 47% actual vs 10% - 15% as Capt stated (47.79561854 / 15 = 3.18637456933) and 47% actual vs 10% (47.79561854 / 10 = 4.779561854)

(2) If we were to remove the side blocks we would have (using current numbers that do smoothly lower) 1.532 DERO every 12 seconds for
1.532 (Dero per block) x 5 (blocks per minute) x 60 (minutes per hour) x 24 (hours per day) = 11030.4 DERO per day (7200 blocks per day) without the side blocks on day 225.

(3) If we add the side blocks back in with an emission rate of 1 DERO per block (1.02 actual ATM) at a rate of 47.79561854% additional blocks on top of the 7200 per day for 3441.2843088 extra DERO per day bringing us to a total of (approximately) ~14471.6843088 DERO on day 225 (18,620.62 Monero mined on day 225)

These appear to be the same minus the language differences
DERO emission: https://github.com/deroproject/derosuite/blob/master/emission/emission.go

Code:

target := config.COIN_DIFFICULTY_TARGET
target_minutes := target / 60
emission_speed_factor := config.COIN_EMISSION_SPEED_FACTOR - (target_minutes - 1)

Monero emission: https://github.com/monero-project/monero/blob/3ad4ecd4ff52f011ee94e0e80754b965b82f072b/src/cryptonote_basic/cryptonote_basic_impl.cpp

Code:

const int target = version < 2 ? DIFFICULTY_TARGET_V1 : DIFFICULTY_TARGET_V2;
const int target_minutes = target / 60;
const int emission_speed_factor = EMISSION_SPEED_FACTOR_PER_MINUTE - (target_minutes-1);

Dero config: https://github.com/deroproject/derosuite/blob/9687ad9cb479bf564c7900b948150200fdd5a301/config/config.go

Code:

var COIN_EMISSION_SPEED_FACTOR = uint64(20)
var COIN_DIFFICULTY_TARGET = uint64(120)

Monero config: https://github.com/monero-project/monero/blob/3ad4ecd4ff52f011ee94e0e80754b965b82f072b/src/cryptonote_config.h

Code:

EMISSION_SPEED_FACTOR_PER_MINUTE (20)
DIFFICULTY_TARGET_V2 120 // seconds
DIFFICULTY_TARGET_V1 60 // seconds

-

So can you at least tell me where the 3.07 blocks came from if the configs were the same and the port appears to be successful with the most basic parameters in place?

Edit: I made a new account to post this btw since I'm not around my bitcointalk passphrase for --Serena--

Edit 2: I'm aware the parameters etc will be different for Atlantis, but I guess I'm wondering why it's still not close to the proper emission curve? I'd dig for what was causing the 3.07 blocks since it's not the basic config, but there's of course no point now. So I'll just leave it at - why is the emission curve still broken?

(Honest question)

Are you talking taking into consideration that side blocks split the reward for that height?