Quote from: FosterEgan on July 20, 2018, 06:21:39 PM

Quote from: cryptobroseph on April 25, 2018, 09:33:51 PM

Tim Draper: More Secure in Bitcoin Than the Money Sitting in Wells Fargo

Venture capitalist Tim Draper is bullish on Bitcoin and believes it will reach $250,000 in the next four years.

During a debate hosted by Intelligence Squared and the Adam Smith Society, Tim Draper was asked how Bitcoin compared with his previous tech investments in Hotmail, Skype, and Tesla. He replied bullishly, saying, Bitcoin will be bigger than all three combined. However, Draper didnt leave it at that he thinks it will be bigger than the iron age, the Renaissance, and the internet and says that the nascent technology will affect the entire world in a faster and more prevalent way than ever imagined.

The Debate: Bitcoin is more than a bubble and here to stay.
Backed up by Patrick Byrne (CEO of overstock), Draper took on Financial Times journalist, Gillian Tett, and Professor of Law, Eric Posner, both of whom argued that Bitcoin is indeed a bubble and strongly contested Drapers claims. Posner and Tett called into question the strengths of Bitcoin, arguing that they could be regarded as weaknesses. Posner suggested that the pseudonymization of identity enabled by the technology makes Bitcoin transactions the perfect vehicle for sophisticated criminal transactions. Tett focused on the risk involved with trusting computers with finance as they can be hacked, are prone to faults, and that Bitcoin is a terrible store of value.

These arguments wont be anything new to anyone who has studied the space, and the rebuttals of Draper and Byrne wont come as a surprise either. The pair acknowledged that Bitcoin was imperfect and drew attention to the fact the technology was designed to be open source so that unforeseen problems can be managed by the community. Byrne also pointed out that although Bitcoin has been hacked at more than anything in history, but unlike banks, it has yet to be defeated.

Draper was more brazen in his responses and implored the crowd to use fiat if they were looking to facilitate their own criminal activity as many Bitcoin criminals get caught. The venture capitalist responded to Tetts admission that she invests in several different fiat currencies by saying, Im so much more secure in my Bitcoin than I am in the money thats sitting there in Wells Fargo.

Who is right?
The short answer is its far too early to tell, but it is good to see the subject being discussed in this manner. Before the debate, Gillian Tett remarked that if both sides of an argument arent heard in the same room, on the same day, then the conversations can go past one another. Its probably safe to say shes right here because, although there is no shortage of media on either side of the argument, real debate on the subject can be difficult to find.

If crypto is going to head down the road Draper expects, its advocates need to be able to argue their case outside of the crypto community, and debate should be welcome as it not only gives both sides the ability to speak but also the ability to listen.

Drapers comments are to be expected
As crypto enthusiasts, its easy to agree when figures like Draper sing the praises of Bitcoin, but we shouldnt let confirmation bias get in the way of the issues. Draper is a successful investor, and he hasnt arrived there without making mistakes. He could be wholly right, wrong, or somewhere in between the latter is most likely. Draper allegedly owns 30,000 BTC, so he has a vested interest in Bitcoins success. That does not mean he is wrong, but it does mean his comments should be taken with a pinch of salt. Well-reasoned arguments are far more convincing than hype and chest beating because they allow people to make up their own minds.

The emergence of DLT might eclipse the impact of other innovations, but for now, the emphasis is not on critics to prove the crypto community wrong. Its up to those who champion DLT to convince the world theyre right.

Originally published at cryptodisrupt.com

When it comes to the safety of the money of course bank is one of the safest. Though if you want your money to double or triple or even more you can put/invest it in crypto but no assurance. May in future as they are improving it more and more buy regulating it but this will soon replace banks. I think Liven is a great example for the context, they are an established business and want their own crypto now just be in the game. I think this is a new wave of projects that are promising and interesting.

I think my money is much safer in the bank than crypto because in there's a risk when i pit my money in crypto. I prefer in tha bank to put my money because it never lose except when there's someone using your atm card. I think it better to invest to crypto only even there's a risk to take, but if your invest crypto have potential then you feel safe about it. I recommend to invest in crypto then put your money in the bank, surely you will get profit then your money is safe.