Quote from: ZeroTheGreat on January 02, 2014, 06:21:19 PM

Quote from: Come-from-Beyond on January 02, 2014, 10:36:30 AM

Quote from: landomata on January 02, 2014, 10:34:08 AM

Quote from: Come-from-Beyond on January 02, 2014, 10:32:15 AM

Quote from: landomata on January 02, 2014, 10:30:34 AM

If coins are stolen....we can freeze them until a full investigation is completed.

Who will play judge Dredd?

VS

So guys with deep pockets will win...

I'm still thinking Global Voting shouldn't exist. Only local votings for assests in Asset Exhange. And there's no owner of NXT Asset. Decentralization, free will of devs and accpetance/rejectiveness of suggested new features of existance/future users (forum's opinoins and installation of new software actions as voting of future). Market.

I also agree that there should be no owner of a NXT asset and that multiple users should be allowed to issue the same NXT asset (e.g. BTC). This forces competition among asset issuers, so that the NXT exchange can be the best it can be. With a single issuer of an asset (e.g. USD, BTC), then the fees/overheads might be too high, making the NXT exchange unattractive.

Also, having multiple issuers for an asset means that there is no central point of failure. If one asset issuer dies or is a fraudster, people will use one of the others. Thus, multiple issuers of an asset is required for the free market to work and probably required for NXT's success.

So, the question for the devs is, will NXT allow multiple users to issue the same asset? The follow on question is, of course, will the block chain implement some kind of feedback system so that asset issuers can be rated according to their honesty?