Quote from: ethtrader16 on July 25, 2018, 10:56:17 AM

Quote from: Zombie259 on July 24, 2018, 05:20:38 PM

Quote from: ibininja on July 24, 2018, 04:05:24 PM

Quote from: ethtrader16 on July 24, 2018, 01:12:43 PM

Quote from: cryptossi on July 24, 2018, 09:02:23 AM

Quote from: Corleone100 on July 24, 2018, 08:53:14 AM

Quote from: ctrades31 on July 24, 2018, 03:18:29 AM

Quote from: Dreladwyn88 on July 23, 2018, 01:20:31 PM

Boom! Your rating was updated https://icoholder.com/en/vanig-20842 🔥 . Congratulations!

That's really amazing. That's mean people and another research sites really like this concept. That's why rating has been increased. Congratulations Vanig Team.

Wow, A big congratulations to the Vanig team but Im having a hard time accessing the above link to checkout the ratings. I will try it out later today again.

Basically Vanig got 4.26 out of 5 which is one of the highest ratings on the ICO Holder website. Great score for a great project, the reception from crypto experts has been excellent so far.

Exactly, while running ICO I seen 1st time rating has increased. That's really amazing and this is happened because of teams hardwork.

What was the previous rating? Do you think it is important to have such rating? I mean I know it is better than having a bad rating because then people researching would feel skeptical other than that do any of you guys use the sites to make an investment.

For a quick overview such rating sites are good. I checked the ICO Holder rating and can not understand why Vanig got such a bad rating in the Activity sector (3.08). In my opinion they are very active in all Social media channels. I don't know how they can be more active.

Why 3.08? Vanig is deserve more than that. They are really much active on social medias and telegram. Vanig team have to contact that rating site who they given less rating.

Bare in mind this was June 3rd when this was done, their algorithm goes against their number of posts etc so guess they've just been a lot more active recently