Quote from: Ace44 on July 26, 2018, 09:47:14 AM

Quote from: ibininja on July 24, 2018, 04:05:24 PM

Quote from: ethtrader16 on July 24, 2018, 01:12:43 PM

Quote from: cryptossi on July 24, 2018, 09:02:23 AM

Quote from: Corleone100 on July 24, 2018, 08:53:14 AM

Quote from: ctrades31 on July 24, 2018, 03:18:29 AM

Quote from: Dreladwyn88 on July 23, 2018, 01:20:31 PM

Boom! Your rating was updated https://icoholder.com/en/vanig-20842 🔥 . Congratulations!

That's really amazing. That's mean people and another research sites really like this concept. That's why rating has been increased. Congratulations Vanig Team.

Wow, A big congratulations to the Vanig team but Im having a hard time accessing the above link to checkout the ratings. I will try it out later today again.

Basically Vanig got 4.26 out of 5 which is one of the highest ratings on the ICO Holder website. Great score for a great project, the reception from crypto experts has been excellent so far.

Exactly, while running ICO I seen 1st time rating has increased. That's really amazing and this is happened because of teams hardwork.

What was the previous rating? Do you think it is important to have such rating? I mean I know it is better than having a bad rating because then people researching would feel skeptical other than that do any of you guys use the sites to make an investment.

Personally i don't use such rating sites when it comes to investment, i've even heard of scenarios where these rating sites approach projects for money before rating and if the team refuse, they will rate the project below average, some just copy from other rating sites and paste on theirs, i rather stick to channels where i can get constructive criticisms and comments such as here than rely on rating sites, my opinion

Yeah, initially I was checking such ratings sites frequently as I was busy and was not having free time to do detailed research. But now I stopped following these rating sites and doing my own research.