Quote from: RickJamesBTC on January 03, 2014, 11:43:11 PM

Quote from: gmaxwell on January 03, 2014, 09:39:13 PM

Quote from: RoadStress on January 03, 2014, 08:15:12 PM

So i am asking you as a moderator. How do they get a scammer tag? Refuse full BTC refunds for who asks or how?

AFAIK we don't issue them anymore.

Quote from: RickJamesBTC

I gotta say, the trust system here is so hidden that it is basically useless. The BIG RED XXXX scammer tag needs to come back.

Once negatively rated by people in the default trust list, hashfast's posts will have a red warning next to them by people using the default trust list. It should be there already, in fact is it not?

Quote from: GlapLaw on January 03, 2014, 08:46:58 PM

I can't imagine that ALL manufacturing for all products was paid for investors. Do you think they used B1 preorders to fund R&D on new machines?

They claimed that they wouldn't be using pre-orders to fund development, what they actually did is anyone's guess much of the coin they'd been paid had apparently not been moved when people were investigating this a week ago.

It's certainly possible, even likely, that they spent some portion of it to cover the actual manufacturing but we wouldn't know when. Though assuming their hardware works those costs should be amply recoverable.

What are the determinations of the "trusted" trust list? I see the list, but if someone isn't one of those select people, nobody ever sees the feedback they send. What's the point of feedback if only a few people are authorized to send it?

Trust system is so fucked up. It's small and it's based on a "default" small trusted list and if those 2-3 people decide not to get involved then it's useless. Is this the kind of open community that we want? Sad open community.