Post
Topic
Board Bounties (Altcoins)
Re: [BOUNTY] 780 ETH - GraphenTech Bounty Now Live
by
icroatt
on 27/07/2018, 21:20:47 UTC
Guys, before you start participating in this ICO, just read this https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4736956.msg42780471#msg42780471
Manager, how can you explain this?

That person is a troll and the thread has been reported. He has been trolling under two different names on all GraphenTech posts. The account is a newbie and has an activity of two, his other account has -3 trust and is also a newbie. The other account goes by the name Arthur

Doesn't look like a troll to me. Can you confirm that Raul Molino isn't part of the team? That guy has a proof Raul was the first CEO of it and even took a screenshot for it. He is also part of the linkedin company created by the team, hows that for a proof. Seem a concrete evidence. Raul had successfully scammed before so someone has to ask this in telegram.

Here is an article from El Universo, the largest news aggregate in Ecuador, stating that Red Tech and Raul Molina did NOT scam anyone out of anything. El Universo even rectified all misinformation and cleared up the entire situation. Its written in Spanish, naturally.

Article: https://www.eluniverso.com/noticias/2017/02/23/nota/6060286/nota-direccion

The rumor continues to be perpetuated by two people on BitcoinTalk, including the one above. If you look at the accusations on any forums or sites, they are usually done by exact same two people. The trolling became so much that Raul stepped back from the project itself.

P.S. The news site that Zalaster quotes is a tiny media outlet in Ecuador called Vistazo, with an Alexa website traffic rank of 80000 (poor). This rectification, on the other hand, was published by El Universo, which is again, the largest news aggregate in Ecuador. El Universo has an Alexa website traffic rank of 1,988 (Great).

Raul Molina was hidden as a member of the team, but that's it!! It does not matter where the article was published, who wrote what was justified - it was not presented to potential investors !!! What are the reasons?? Is this correct?

He stepped down from his position on the team amidst trolling to not hurt the image of the company, seems justifiable to me. Brock Pierce did the same thing on the EOS team amidst former allegations (none of which were proven true) and trolling. Does that make EOS bad? No.

If a whole bunch of news aggregates clear his name and say there is no evidence of foul play, that's proof enough for me.