Quote from: hv_ on July 29, 2018, 05:28:37 PM

Quote from: JayJuanGee on July 29, 2018, 09:19:49 AM

Quote from: hv_ on July 29, 2018, 06:57:29 AM

Quote from: JayJuanGee on July 28, 2018, 08:27:19 PM

Quote from: hv_ on July 28, 2018, 02:42:41 PM

Haha, digged old stuff out - still good and correct.

Small blocks was dictated by the 'best' software devs and a fiat based blockstream, blocking on chain stream.

Bitcoin business devs moved on, since on-chain scaling is provenly possible in the global money world.

Sure, not with Raspis, censure and social engineering, but with decent tech and investment like minres already achieved over last years.

Do you have a BIP? Or are you merely suggesting that folks here migrate over to bcash, since bcash is surely superior to bitcoin with its segwit and lightning network and other second layer scaling, right?

KISS is king.

Complexity will die or never take off.

Get the fuck out of here with your assertion that segwit and lightning are complex, or too complex and that the purported complexity of these will be a meaningful hinderance for bitcoin. You are speculating without fact, and some kind of nice talking point that is NOT justified in reality (but it sure sounds nice, right?)

And good luck with your KISS on bcash.... scaling has been playing out well on bcash, right? No traffic and so there is plenty of room for expansion... you guys are doing very well.. it's gonna be lovely.. you, Roger, Craig, jbreher, Jihan and PeterR... one bigblocker happy and quasi centralized family.

Haha, yes its easy to trigger religious ppl who still believe their core is the center of the truth, and only these few!

like https://mobile.twitter.com/BashCo_/status/1023593797127745541 as well.

Nah, you ll get it little later then. Still all segregating forces active here.

https://mobile.twitter.com/Bitcoin/status/1023477720036962304

You have been spouting Bcash and BIG blocker nonsense for quite a long time hv, and attempting to assert that you are bringing some kind of value to the conversation, and suggesting that bitcoin is "going in the wrong direction," blah, blah blah...

Furthermore, your suggestion that bitcoin is merely acting on some kind of "religious dogma" rather than accounting for better technology is misleading, and just a stupid-ass superficial attack assertion.

You realize that segwit was adopted by consensus, correct? segwit allows for keeping smaller blocks and off chain scaling. You don't want to accept such consensus direction of bitcoin so you spout out bcash/big blocker talking points, on an ongoing basis.... asserting doom and gloom for bitcoin, blah blah blah.

You are wrong, hv. Why can't you face it? You just want to continue to assert nonsense and disinformation....

Regarding bitcoincore.org removing bitcoin.org from their web resources, so fucking what? If that website, including bitcoin.com, is engaged in the misleading of people into suggesting that bcash is the real bitcoin, then this is not about religion, but instead about attempting to minimize the impact of an attack vector. BIG blockers and bcash nutjobs, including yourself, continue to engage in physical attacks on bitcoin and also propaganda (informational) attacks on bitcoin, so it remains fair game to lessen the impact of some of the informational attack vectors, such as removing bitcoin.org from the bitcoincore.org resources pages. That is not called "religion," it is called "defense" against an attack vector (and perhaps even "offense" against an attack vector depending on how the matter is framed).