Quote from: goigiacmove on July 29, 2018, 09:21:23 AM

Quote from: PinkStar on July 29, 2018, 09:08:44 AM

What we initially had in mind was to implement KRB's "masternodes", we realized that it would have no use and little income for those hosting them. Real masternodes will bring benefits for the project, for those who host them, fewer coins in the exchanges and more in demand, the only negative thing are the lower earnings for the miners, but seeing that they are more positive than the negative ones , we are happy to know your opinion too. Pos could also help to reduce the coins in the exchange but the cons is that we will find a total supply much higher than the current 120 million.
Thanks for the advice

It might be better if the team can build up shared-masternode for upcoming masternode platform.
Shared masternode (if implemented) might help small investors to join the party despite of the fact that they don't have too much money to own one masternode.
Shared masternode might help them to earn higher profits than simply let their coins staking.

I too think that Shared Masternodes and masternodes sounds like a good idea.

Another way to think about this is that PSTAR becoming MN coin will increase its price. And this will benefit both miners and MN holders. It may even invite more miners looking for passive coin generation.
The increased price will allow you to have more funds to develop the coin