Quote from: georgem on January 04, 2014, 06:31:14 PM

Quote from: hypersire on January 04, 2014, 06:12:00 PM

Quote from: georgem on January 04, 2014, 05:26:52 PM

Quote from: aneki on January 04, 2014, 05:21:25 PM

BTC38 was going to implement Quark but volume was too large and they delayed the trading. When their system is ready for that volume they will add it. It's a great time to stock up on Quarks after the big crash of pretty much everything in december. Quark is one of my top 3 bets in the year to come.

volume to large?

I wish that was the case. But have you looked at the volume of quark at vircurex.com lately? It rarely is more than 10 BTC a day...

At the moment it's only at 2.7 BTC...

Embarrassed

Georgem, yes, Vircurex does have low volume but they are just a small fish. Have a look here:

http://www.cryptmarketcap.com/

Quark is listed as having 102 BTC volume over the last day.

The only coins with a higher volume are Bitcoin, Litecoin and surprisingly, Dogecoin and Worldcoin.

Yes, I understand, but I have seen atleast 40 BTC at vircurex with quark a while ago (2 weeks or so).

People probably prefer cryptsy at the moment, because of the higher liquidity.

Should cryptsy have those lags and serverproblems again then more volume will switch to vircurex again.

It's good to have many exchanges.

Hmm, I didn't realize the volume was that high before at Vircurex. Well, we definitely need more exchanges - as soon as a QRK/USD exchange comes out I have no doubt volume will pick up dramatically.