Quote from: TryNinja on July 30, 2018, 01:50:34 AM

Quote from: Gyrsur on July 29, 2018, 09:50:53 PM

interesting too. seems not for the first time.

EDIT: campaign manager profiles and addresses.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=507936
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=862062
https://www.blockchain.com/btc/address/1DarkStrRagcDjWtsPGxkav4WG3poLXzDS
https://www.blockchain.com/btc/address/3NSvhvYYBMVh1bPyKWjPfyiF3RHAAgsgtw

EDIT2: chipmixer.com address: https://www.blockchain.com/btc/address/1ChipWGhJtEWCeSq3cra4HmKhvYqe8Tvty

interesting, the campaign payouts goes directly from chipmixer.com address to members and not via the campaign managers address. this could mean the campaign manager holds the priv key to this address. both prefer vanity addresses.

I'm pretty sure this is just you trolling us again (is this your new hobby?). But this address doesn't belong to ChipMixer (obviously). It's an address created by DarkStar to escrow the funds and pay the campaign users.

Quote from: DarkStar_ on May 26, 2017, 11:45:12 PM

~snip~

I will be holding the funds for this campaign, and paying participants. The escrow address will be topped up as the campaign progresses.

Code:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

I, DarkStar_ (u=507936) am escrowing funds for the ChipMixer campaign that I am managing in the address 1ChipWGhJtEWCeSq3cra4HmKhvYqe8Tvty
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: Keybase OpenPGP v2.0.70
Comment: https://keybase.io/crypto

wsBcBAABCgAGBQJZJ6MjAAoJEIZVviH1IAyt6z4H/ii3xV9/IOQyVOXTdPZzd/al
chpHY7gblLQ/C3BNR9Tx+v5mDvgDFFEJW7AH5AVDfqvz8w5NSFPSRn2Au22u5HyU
Ab30xludXpSx8ADEm7m8/T6GNppGRVL2KKlxQSRZMcE9RwTRKOKLu5lUD6U45XUU
hlO1XgvBv6XHUA6sm56R2Nwnwy0cZnvStH2fgGkadwsyzCmFpqSTCoXQDZJnwgzL
30RxBt8GrKtIEIoLWpi+0EULf2bP/Q4+rklJBoeUARiw0t1xs2dsBJkPNEDGOlEQ
+4uc/jirIAeBGRMfYLOrv/QO1CmLwJ7s/j9BI76/IPIMU2oI6rERhykFmU8Cyu4=
=Z/gC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

ChipMixer's address is: 1ChipMwvHe5tewb1Uqa9bbZZJDmgPV1TC7 as stated in their website (https://chipmixer.com/about);
While the escrow address is: 1ChipWGhJtEWCeSq3cra4HmKhvYqe8Tvty (notice the blatantly difference).

Good detective work btw.

P.S: Got you out of my ignore list after DarkStar's post. But I'm willing to put you back soon.

escrow address was funded (2017-05-26) before the chipmixer address (2017-08-16). makes no sense to me in this order.

EDIT: it's more an indicator that cipmixer created this escrow address and not the campiagn manager. or they are both the same.

EDIT2: if this chipmixer address has an operational need (which it has) then you will create and fund it with the start of the operation or before. after your business is working and you have too less customers your are thinking about to improve it. then comes the escrow address into the game. in this order.

Quote from: https://chipmixer.com/about

We sign receipts with 1ChipMwvHe5tewb1Uqa9bbZZJDmgPV1TC7 address.
Our BitcoinTalk account is ChipMixer.

Quote from: https://chipmixer.com/faq

What is a signed receipt?

Our goal is to make Bitcoin value independent of its blockchain history. Some governments and corporations wants to invalidate its value by claiming they are connected to something immoral like gambling. Every time you withdraw from ChipMixer, we give you cryptographically signed receipt that proves you have received those funds from us. Since the disconnection of history is proven, there can be no loss of value.

EDIT3: Alpha test thread --> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1923170.0

it was a single man show from the begining. even the reaction time if issues occure proves this.

IMO, chipmixer and campaign manager does not involves more then 2 people. maybe even just one. and if not just one both are strong connected in the same local community.