Quote from: zero4five on July 31, 2018, 09:06:50 PM

The lack of aggressive strategy is at high risk, and also that, in fact, it is not investment, but speculation.
With moderate strategies, the investor expects to make a profit after a certain time, for example, in a few months. For this, it is not enough to rely on the leaping course, we must study in detail and analyze the prospects of the chosen currency.
Large investors with solid capital, work experience and market knowledge, as a rule, do not limit themselves to one type of strategy. Usually they form a portfolio of different assets, and each is selected their own approach.

I am not sure what to understand from your first sentence. Do you mean, that the lack of aggressive strategy is a high risk factor and a speculation?
Could you please explain this idea in more detail?

I fully agree, having a specialized strategy for each coin itself is the professional way to go.
I bet a lot of experience is of great help, but that must be gained by people like me yet.

It will take a while to set up such a system with this kind of depth from scratch though.
As I mentioned in my first post - the pattern I described with the dark numbers can also be used in more detail, which includes an entire project itself.

This is still only the asset management part, I still need to make a strategy on how to exit.
Buying has been pretty simple in the last months, because of all these beautiful dips. Selling would have been extremely lucrative too, but I was actually expecting the bullrun to happen already.
The other way around could be, that my greed stopped me from making profits. The fear of missing the bull if selling...(yes, I know its FOMO) That is the reason why I might benefit from technical analysis while having my strategy implemented. It feels like a safety cord to a certain extend, though losses are inevitable, they happen to everybody at some point.

I wonder how well professional traders can trade cryptos, like how their profit : loss ratio in the number of their trades looks like (simply profitable trades vs non profitable trades, not the value of the trading itself)