Quote from: syypro on August 02, 2018, 12:29:20 PM

Quote from: deonyx on August 02, 2018, 07:47:18 AM

There has been many arguments about this topic and while some people put a direct blame to bounty hunters who sell their tokens immediately after ICO and yet very few people can really place hands on the real issue.

Pls click this to see a sample of crypto project token distribution which represents vast majority that falls in this category that I would like to point to as the main reason why the price of some token goes below ICO price after launch.
Sample: https://s33.postimg.cc/stsemoukf/IMG_1533191759678.jpg

Usually the capacity of every project team is never the same, some already have what it takes to finance their project from the beginning while some don't and plan to raise all the money from the token sales and while this helps them to achieve their soft and hard cap, it also places other limitations that is not so obvious

Most investors are profit oriented and wants to make their money either short term or long term and so also is the large group of the bounty hunters.

50% of the token supply and even more goes to pre-sale and public sale which gives the team the required amount needed, then 2.5% goes to the community for airdrop+bounty+bonuses which is where the hunters share from. The pre-sale and private sales usually goes for much lower prices with good discounts compared to the public ICO, which is why it's very attractive to the early investors which later turn to early dumpers. Then after launch, those that bought from pre-sale and ICO dumps the large portion of the coin and forces the price down yet they still feels that it's the 2.5% that the hunters share with airdrop and bonuses that made their price to go down.

Feel free to drop your thoughts on this

I fully support your thoughts. Early investors shed coins to minimize losses in the event of project damping. They sell half, thereby returning their money, and the remainder remain until better times. At the same time, they do not risk anything.

You got the Gist totally, the harm doesn't even come from the low volume shared among many hunters cos their shared volume has a low weight and cannot affect nothing in the market because many of them received low quantities that cannot even be put into the market at the ICO price only few hunters makes above average quantity