I'll say this one last time. The biggest investors are all in our private token holder telegram group or have me on direct contact on telegram, skype or email.
None of them have the concerns you have been posting non stop for a week because they all read the terms of the ico before they bought tokens and have had constant updates from me.
The only things you, game-protect, chazley and a few others are posting here is speculation about things you don't know about (you are not a token holder), exaggerations, false information or outright lies (chazley being the worse there).
If you were an actual token holder and you were in the correct channels you would know everything that has went on with the site, costs, plans, how many tokens I've bought back, where funds have been spent on etc.
I've bought back enough where I now own over 70% of tokens. I'm not sure who you think has been done over.
Again, all major investors knew exactly the terms and what they were getting in to, like they did with countless other ICO's they bought in to, which have actually performed far worse than BetKing.
Are there a few people unhappy? Yes. But they are mostly people who didn't do due diligence and read the details of the ico before they bought tokens, like people do with a lot of other ico's. Most of these people have sold all their tokens back to me anyway.
So feel free to continue the spam attack and spreading false information but until you have a real token holder (easy to prove, it's crypto remember) then there is nothing for me to answer in this thread.
Thank you for the information you provided in the message. I will get back to you in a day or two after trying to verify that information. I suppose I appreciate you mentioning some of the things you did mention because maybe you did not have to but if that information is readily available to ICO investors and there is some sort of way to cross-reference the information then I will try to get hold of the very last or most recent sheet you made available, after that I will get back to you.
Yes in ICOs not all investors will ever be happy and many will make a profit and many a loss. Personally I feel the lack of (as you refer to it)
people who didn't do due diligence and read the details of the ico before they bought tokens does not make it plain and simple the fault of the investors. In fairness to them the bounty participants were trying to shut down, shout down and silence any voice that asked questions about the way the token system was valued. And yes you made everything clear (except some people thought they were buying a portion of the casino and some thought they were buying a portion of profits) and you also made it clear that you would no longer answer any questions because they doubted your motives.
I raised many concerns with you at the time about why a millionaire would shut down and re-open a betting website. I raised many concerns and questions and was not really happy with the response or the eagerness of the bounty participants to drown out my voice along with others that questioned the process but we tried to get clarity.
If what you say is true about owning 70% of the tokens out there then to be fair to investors you should not be claiming your 'profits' on those tokens. The profits should be distributed between the ICO investors and most definitely not on the 30 million tokens that were not released to the ICO investors and not on any that you personally held or any that Betking purchased in the buy back. My personal belief is you did not spend all of the 30 million retained tokens on marketing and development and you are still claiming 'profits' on those when the 'profits' should be going to the ICO and other token investors. If you say the investors have clarity on exactly what the state of play was and is regarding the tokens you held then, hold now and also sold then that is great news. I will try to get hold of that information, check it and get back to you.
Having said all that I thank you again for making a bold statement about you owning 70% of the Betking tokens. I just hope that you stop selling tokens now because the formula is flawed and helps only you while ensuring the investor loses out. If you must continue to sell the tokens then please consider raising the 10% buy-back to at least 25% and please consider defining another formula to sell future tokens so that investors can at least be in a position to make something more in 'profit' and ROI wise.
About the signature, as a gesture of goodwill I will be removing the comments about you and Betking. Thank you.