Quote from: Waves.support on August 05, 2018, 04:19:20 PM

Quote from: Coinblaze on August 05, 2018, 03:45:51 PM

Quote from: Dildo Shwaggins on August 05, 2018, 01:21:37 PM

Wow two consecutive fud posts! This guy is trying hard. Grin

Don't get me wrong, I love Waves and now hold alot because it's a steal at this price. But I'm just saying what others are thinking, and no answers are forthcoming... I believe my posts are thoughtful and intelligent, and I genuinely hope that Waves can clean up its act.

Quote from: Waves.support on August 05, 2018, 01:43:11 PM

Hello. There will be a payment gateway for ERC20 tokens as a temporary decision before atomic swaps. Obviously there are difficulties with implementing a new payment gateway because Waves Platform has only the following gateways: Bitcoin, Ethereum, Litecoin, Zcach, Bitcoin Cash, Dash and Monero. That's why it's not very easy to add all Ethereum-based tokens via payment gateways.

I'll have to disagree with you there. What's the difference between accepting 1 ERC20 token or 10 ERC20 tokens? When the work is done for 1, 99% of the work is done for all. That's the whole point of ERC20 tokens.

Quote from: Waves.support on August 05, 2018, 01:43:11 PM

Speaking about voting, it's impossible to be included in the list of voters without taking part in voting because anyone can check the list of wallets there. There's no point in this.

You missed the whole point of my post. It's that the voting is centralized and not on the blockchain. Waves can make up votes if it wants, and have them appear on that list, to force whatever token they want to win. Hence, no point in that vote. To have a proper vote, it needs to be on the blockchain. Eg, send any minimal amount of Waves to a certain address that corresponds to your vote. That's how I've seen other votes be done in the past. Other projects using Waves tokens are looking at how Waves itself does things, and this is not the correct way to hold a vote at all.

More clarifications concerning your questions about ERC20 voting will be announced in our social media such as Twitter: https://twitter.com/wavesplatform and Telegram news and announcements channel: https://t.me/wavesnews
in the near future. Kindly rely on your patience and understanding.
But I mean, what's the point for the whole platform to be engaded in falsification of the voting results if someone can discover his wallet in this list?
This is an unjustifiable risk for the whole project.

Kind regards,
Waves Community Manager

To be honest I also didn't get this part "What's the difference between accepting 1 ERC20 token or 10 ERC20 tokens?"

And who will be the gateway provider? Coinomat?
The last thing, voting will end around at the end of the month. So smart contract should be on the mainnet. Wouldn't atomic swap more logical?