Quote from: ibminer on August 06, 2018, 02:26:52 PM

Quote from: Quickseller on August 06, 2018, 04:35:04 AM

--nonsense about 2 posts later, it's my idea - give me credit, archived!--

Thanks for the archive, one less step for me. Wink

Quickseller at post #23: http://archive.is/oRIC6#selection-10510.1-10526.6

The 2nd post of this thread could have certainly been better inspiration for Vod to adjust the merit calculations:
http://archive.is/oRIC6#selection-1543.0-1545.116

If that's not enough, the 21st post (2 posts before yours):
http://archive.is/oRIC6#selection-9489.86-9489.130

Seems like plagiarism to me?? Shocked

You appear to be operating on the assumption that they are different than me. Have you sufficiently ruled that out?

Regardless, Vod has a habit of following my posts fairly closely, so he probably did make the decision to upgrade the formula after reading the suggestion from QS. I dont see any other reason why he would announce the change exactly 8 hours, 29 minuets, 45 seconds after I brought up the point.