''had to do with some changes in nature'' Are you talking about evolution? Your <70 IQ is showing again. Evolution refers to change, and in particular in our gene-centered age, change due to changes in genes. Mutation changes DNA sequence, and if that change is transmitted to the next generation, the populations gene pool, its set of genotype variants, has changedit has evolved. I already gave you plenty of examples of this, the lizard speciation example for instance clearly fits the definition of evolution.
Evolution can't be change, because evolution doesn't exist. Evolution isn't anything.
Change is cause and effect programming. Mutation is simply change via C&E programming.
You don't need me to give you any C&E examples, because you and all people - especially the scientists among us - use C&E everyday. But like your inability to give us any proof for evolution, you don't have even one proof for pure random (opposite of C&E). Yet, C&E, adaptation, and like-begets-like abound all over the place in quantities too numerous for us to be able to count.
Evolution is a hoax, and its perpetrators are destroyers of knowledge.
Hmm, we all know evolution exists
How do you figure that cause and effect eliminates the possibility of Evolution? Sounds like you think they are mutual exclusive?
Everything is cause and effect; there is always, in everything, a cause that gives an effect. While in science, fabrication / engineering you use causal systems and experiments, its either a closed system or you only see the effects that materialize. In other areas its purely a philosophic subject, because here you wonder also about the things that could have materialized, but did not.
Nothing excludes evolution in neither science or in philosophy, cause and effect.
There is no such thing as cause and effect programming in Evolution. Cause and effect, yes, programming, no. Evolution works in the biggest system we know, the universe, with no option to step outside the system to observe. The observer is himself part of the experiment. There is absolutely no way to run the experiment without either contributing to the cause, or being an effect. An Engineer conducting an experiment does it from the outside, observing in. He is able to add or remove items in order to observe cause and effect. He is not himself part of the experiment.