Quote from: icalical on August 21, 2018, 02:55:38 PM

I am not against FOXICO or anything, but from my experience with ICO review platform, most of their reviews are paid reviews. Only a small amount of the reviewer actually review the ICO based on its quality, even if the reviewer said they are professional. If FOXICO really want to get into this field, how will you prevent your reviewer write a "paid-review" and make them stick to their track?

You are welcome to take a look at "How it works" section at Foxico https://foxico.io/howitworks
Logic is explained. In few words I can describe it here:

Behind each rating stands a weight (that is acquired by quality of this person's ratings) that influences the final score.

Anyone who rates can be simply liked/disliked by others members and it influences the weight of this particular expert. Therefore the final score of an expert who got a lot of dislikes does not influence the total score of a project and his scoring has low weight as a result.

For example when you see someone rated a scam with a 10 you simply dislike it just as others 10 people do and this person (who rated) loses weight immediately and later his score doesnt influence the total final score.

Math stands behind the system that leads to fair ratings.