Quote from: AteenaD on August 21, 2018, 04:05:07 PM

Quote from: Dacosta Osei-Tutu on June 17, 2018, 06:58:15 AM

So ones again we have been scammed by another ICO known as Uchit. Now people have started raining insults and curses on the bounty manager that he has led them to be scammed. Despite the numerous apologies from the manager, bounty hunters do not seem to understand. Now my question is, do you think bounty hunters must be blamed when we are scammed because they knew what the ICO was up to, even from the beginning?

I vehemently do not agree that bounty managers were to be blame. Bounty Managers were just there to supervise or oversee that the bounty campaign was in order. I am truly convinced that even them had the slightest idea beforehand that the ICO they were handling was a scam. I once had an experience with an ICO that appeared to be a scam. The bounty manager was the one that advised all the bounty hunters to stopped from all our tasks because he had that strange feeling that it was really a fraud. He saved us totally from wasting our works. From that moment on, I am actually convinced that he is the best bounty manager this forum had ever had. I strongly believe that if we have to blame someone, it should have been their admins.

You're wrong buddy because the bounty or campaign manager can be blame if an ICO turn out to be scam because the manager also have the right to investigate the legitimacy of a project before managing it and I'm saying this cause I have seen a lot of manager on here who happen to quit a project which they ought to manage because of scam issue. However, I will advice you guys to always go for campaign which is manage by higher ranking member or a member with good reputation..... But, if the ICO project don't fulfil all their promises manager are not to be blame for that.

Note: manager also does their own research about project and only an inexperience manager will not do the right research about project before managing it.