Quote from: BADecker on August 22, 2018, 02:52:02 PM

Quote from: Astargath on August 21, 2018, 05:47:25 PM

Quote from: BADecker on August 20, 2018, 11:26:10 PM

None of us knows that evolution theory evolution (ETE) exists.

Cause and effect eliminates random. Every cause causes an effect exactly according to the way the cause affects the effect. Nothing random. Yet, random is a requirement for ETE. Google "random mutations evolution."

If the cause didn't produce the exact effect that was caused, fabrication and engineering wouldn't work. The only difference in nature is that the causes and effects are many, and are tiny enough that we can't track them. But physics is exact. It controls everything so that the cause always causes the exact effect required by the way the cause acts. There is no room for random as ETE suggests.

Since this is the way the whole universe works, there is no ETE evolution. There might be simple change, or there might be adaptation, and you can call both of these evolution to some extent, but they are not ETE.

An engineer conducting an experiment is the cause, and often uses many causes to obtain the effects he is looking for. If things were random as ETE calls for, the engineer could never know if he would ever get the desired results/effects.

Standard scientists know this. They know that ETE is impossible, despite what they say. Because of this...

Evolution is a hoax.

Cool

''Every cause causes an effect exactly according to the way the cause affects the effect. Nothing random.'' Radioactive decay disagrees with you. Although this whole concept is still extremely complex, scientists simply don't know whether everything is random or not. As we currently understand it, quantum randomness is true and absolute randomness, said theoretical physicist York Dobyns in an email to the Epoch Times. Nothing in the universe can predict quantum outcomes except at a statistical level.

Going back to Evolution. Someone once started to think about animals and how they came to be, he eventually realized that through adaption, change, mutations they eventually are able to pass that onto the next generation and called it evolution. Simply defined: ''Evolution is change in the heritable characteristics of biological populations over successive generations.''

The change can happen through adaption or mutation, it doesn't matter, what matters is that it's passed to next generations. For instance the lizards I talked about ''Each time lizards colonized an island, they evolved into many of the same forms. On each island, some lizards adapted to living high in trees, evolving pads on their feet for gripping surfaces, along with long legs and a stocky body. Other lizards adapted to life among the thin branches lower down on the trees, evolving short legs that help them hug their narrow perches. ''

Because they were able to pass those characteristics/changes/adaptions to next generations, they evolved because that's the definition of evolution. Check mate.

Nobody has proof that radio active decay is not a C&E thing. More than likely, it is something like evolution, that some scientists want evolution or randomness so bad that they are grasping at one of the few straws left to them.

The fact that nobody can predict quantum this or that, simple means that we aren't smart enough. It doesn't have anything to do with what exists or doesn't exist, especially in quantum, since quantum is simply complex probability.

Going back to evolution, random mutations would be required according to ETE. No random mutations, because no random, = no evolution... at least not according to the ETE form of evolution. Nice try, however, to sidetrack us from the bottom line of no randomness.

There isn't any checkmate regarding evolution. Why not? Because evolution doesn't exist.

Evolution is a hoax.

Cool

Here is the issue with your arguments, badecker, are you a god? How is it that you always know better than top scientists in their fields? Because you always seem to know the answer to questions that thousands of scientists haven't been able to respond for decades. Right now radioactive decay is defined as a ''stochastic (i.e. random) process at the level of a singular quantum of single atoms, in that, according to quantum theory, it is impossible to predict when a particular atom will decay'' This is what the quantum theory says right now, you claim to know somehow that it's not true. How? Are you god?