Quote from: Lauda on August 23, 2018, 01:37:35 PM

Quote from: suchmoon on August 23, 2018, 01:10:07 PM

Why can't it be posted publicly instead of having to trust yet another person?

The information about investors was never public (aside of the total raised, but that is needed for token allocation), and it certainly won't be made public because there are a few disgruntled individuals that anonymously wrote some bad words.

I don't think anybody here expects personal/sensitive info about investors. Anything that's on the blockchain is fair game though and you could quash most of the allegations in the OP by showing how those coins moved and where it all resides now.

Quote from: Lauda on August 23, 2018, 01:37:35 PM

Quote from: suchmoon on August 23, 2018, 01:10:07 PM

If I was one of the NVO bagholders I'd be furious. I think they're entitled to proper communication.

And they have been receiving that, via the NVO TG channel. Plus, there is nothing really to convey from my end: Vote is in progress; decision is made by current holders based on the vote (which is currently in favor of a refund using the existing balance). It's as simple as that.

TG (or any chat contraption) is not a good way to communicate with investors. There are some scraps of info on Reddit and Medium although I was only able to find it by googling "NVO vote". Nothing on NVO website that I can see. How did the bagholders learn about the vote? It seems very short (2 weeks) and on short notice. Did the team or the escrow e-mail registered users?

Quote from: Lauda on August 23, 2018, 03:19:53 PM

Again, it had nothing to do with existing escrow deals. Can you stop with the kool-aid and making up your own stories about my services that aren't even remotely based on reality?

Does this mean that BCH and other major forks will be distributed to NVO bagholders? Simply stating that plus some blockchain proof of the escrow holding those amounts would be much better than this endless back-and-forth.