Quote from: Quickseller on August 23, 2018, 09:55:02 PM

Quote from: suchmoon on August 23, 2018, 09:37:34 PM

Quote from: OgNasty on August 23, 2018, 08:59:21 PM

I still don't understand why you changed your escrow rules about forks after taking these funds, and then claim your escrow thread and escrow services aren't related. Huh

You keep repeating this after Lauda had already stated numerous times that the rule change did not apply retroactively to the NVO escrow. Stop being an asshole just for the sake of being an asshole.

I think you forgot to reference where lauda posted where he disclosed this to ICO investors prior to them sending money to the project.

Further this term has no equity for the investors and as such is unenforceable in court.

All of this ignores the fact that it is very unlikely this would be a negotiated term at the time the ANN thread was created.

I like to ask Lauda questions to try and get the real story from the horse's mouth. I would have loved to have asked my questions in PM, but I've been blocked. When Lauda doesn't answer my questions and replies with insults, I can only go by the information he has provided that I come across, which is very little and extremely scattered. The CET page was one central resource where there was info about his escrow services, so people go there to get info on his escrow rules. Seems reasonable right? Then when people ask questions about the inconsistencies they're insulted and left negative trust instead of Lauda simply answering the questions. I'm merely here asking questions for the several members who have been PMing me begging me to look into this as they are fearful of receiving negative default trust and being insulted if they ask the questions, like what just happened to rmcdermott927. I've already marked Lauda a scammer a long time ago. There's no agenda here from me except to find out exactly what happened. If Lauda can prove that he acted in the best interests of the escrow fund depositors and didn't take additional funds he was not entitled to, I would be happy to remove my most recent trust rating.

What you need to understand is that I don't care about Lauda. I don't believe he does any legitimate business for me to effect anyway, so attacking him to tarnish his reputation further is not something I care about wasting time on. I do care about the newbies who take a first step into Bitcoin only to be scammed and get turned off to crypto. It is not fair that Lauda walks away with a payday, and they take a haircut on their investment. When he says things like multisig addresses can't be signed, I immediately know that is a deflection and he can sign his address used for his part of the multisig. Maybe other people don't know that and need someone to explain these points since they clearly can't trust their escrow agent to not hide behind semantics to dodge their requests. My hope is that Lauda hasn't stolen any funds, can prove this publicly, and investors get the maximum amount of funds possible returned to them, while those responsible for this scam are held responsible.