Quote from: Coin_Master on January 12, 2014, 03:18:29 AM

Quote from: jspielberg on January 11, 2014, 05:59:03 PM

Quote from: cedivad on January 11, 2014, 05:17:40 PM

Quote from: RickJamesBTC on January 11, 2014, 05:07:54 PM

you may as well let them run away with your money.

I would really love to have the data HF has about the % of people who agreed to a USD refund and the % that actually sent a certified letter demanding a proper refund.

I would love to know the % of refunders who paid with usd vs btc. My guess is so far it as predominantly been usd-ers. I can't see any btc-ers willing to take a 90% haircut for HF.

jcambond posted an address HashFast used to collect payments.

Quote from: jcambond on January 08, 2014, 06:10:03 PM

I sent my entire payment to: 1B3FHM4Ax5BFuRidKBcfURfMaPBEDMDvQ8
Is there a way to know whether these BTC were eventually cashed out through bitpay?

This payment was then sent directly to address 17hCi8apMUkzzLLJgUwfXxRJuykuo5Lcur
We can be confident this is HashFast's own address by looking at the first and last deposits to the address, and the dates.
On August 6 2013 at 6:30pm a test deposit of 0.001 BTC was received, this is in line with the timeline for the first sales.
On October 28 2013 the last transaction can be observed, from this point deposits were directed to another collection address.
By this time it had become evident to customers there was a problem, and HashFast began directing payments elsewhere.
Looking at the total BTC deposits it is clear HashFast have received most of the payments in BTC. It also appears HashFast have oversold the number of stated units available. This may explain why Batch 2,3 and 4 Baby Jet orders are not published. It can also be confirmed that not all of the BTC deposits have been converted to USD through BitPay as suggested. Here at address 17Vj6tneMEueGgS64aEiNr1fHurEiEHZas we find 1.25 BTC. This deposit came from address 1BGWkLdRwK8PPGH5ziToopTSdnsjtjM8aa which in turn came from 17hCi8apMUkzzLLJgUwfXxRJuykuo5Lcur
There can be no confusion because both addresses have had only one deposit. Hope this helps.

This may help some more: https://www.google.com/search?q=https%3A%2F%2Fblockchain.info+%22hashfast%22&rlz=1C1CHFX_enUS549US549&oq=https%3A%2F%2Fblockchain.info+%22hashfast%22&aqs=chrome..69i57j69i58.6767j0j4&sourceid=chrome&espv=210&es_sm=122&ie=UTF-8#es_sm=122&espv=210&q=site:https:%2F%2Fblockchain.info+%22hashfast%22