Quote from: SaltySpitoon on August 24, 2018, 01:37:02 PM

Not that I care all that much because the people arguing here don't actually seem to be involved with the project, ie I'd care more if it was investors who were complaining about mismanaged funds and not random people with vendettas against each other. But just curious, would the ~10 BTC from the BTCCash to BTC exchange that people say have gone missing happen to be from a fork exchange service fee? As in a service that searches for forks, converts them all to BTC, and then handles the transaction?

That's a question you won't get an answer to (& it's 10-78 BTC in question). Maybe because you, "don't actually seem to be involved with the project."

Quote from: vlom on August 24, 2018, 02:29:56 PM

puhhh, what a mess.

1. I invested in NVO.
2. I would not have sent BTC into this ICO if the funds would not have been held by an escrow.
3. NVO development is a disaster and it had to be stoped.

This is why I asked the question about who decided the additional 30% should be released and if there was a vote... It appears the investors didn't believe the goals were being met.

Quote from: suchmoon on August 24, 2018, 03:03:42 PM

Quote from: OgNasty on August 24, 2018, 04:38:09 AM

I can be trusted with this. I wouldnt touch this dumpster fire, but implying I am somehow untrustworthy is pretty lame suchmoon. This escrow was not handled properly. Asking questions is appropriate.

Trust is earned, not declared. You can ask questions, that's not the problem. The problem is that your judgement in this matter can't be trusted due to your past disputes with Lauda and your inability to separate personal quarrels from affecting your perception of facts. You have neg-trusted someone for posting in your thread. You're spreading reprehensible rumours about forum members you're squabbling with. There's a good chance that you'd make something up to get back at Lauda.

Dude, you are nuts. I don't know if you spend too much time drinking the cool-aid or what, but I have earned more trust than anyone else on this site. I wouldn't risk my reputation to make something up about a documented extortionist who is doing an excellent job of showing his incompetence and inability to be transparent without any assistance from me. In any event, 2 of the 3 multisig escrows aren't making any comment on the situation, Lauda isn't giving any information about exchange rates or remaining funds he's holding that aren't his, and I think that is enough for me to say that this escrow has been a dumpster fire. No sense continuing to beat a dead horse. Everyone can see for themselves how this situation is being handled, who is remaining silent, and who is defending the wrongdoing.

Transparency. It's not for everyone I guess. Undecided

Quote from: suchmoon on August 24, 2018, 04:21:17 PM

Og volunteered, so which category he's in? Corrupt or shill?

What part of, "I wouldn't touch this dumpster fire" did you think was me volunteering? Amazing how this type of situation can happen, and some members want to make it about me.

Quote from: suchmoon on August 24, 2018, 04:48:46 PM

your self-proclaimed reputation

How is the trust system self proclaimed?

Quote from: suchmoon on August 24, 2018, 04:48:46 PM

Sorry for misinterpreting that

Misinterpreting seems to be your MO. It's all good. Thanks for the apology.