Quote from: marlboroza on August 28, 2018, 12:44:48 AM

Well, I see 0.0990 now and it doesn't say infinity any more(will edit post).

But how "30 million will be retained by BetKing for ICO bounties, testing bounties, advisors, hiring, future marketing and development." turned into "I'm buying tokens back with my own profit, the 30 million tokens I keep from the ICO"?

These funds should have been used for what was stated in ICO and we are talking about $2.7M worth tokens.

If they have not been used for promotion, development etc then I don't see any reason why all 100% invested money shouldn't be in that bankroll, or better, why investors didn't receive all 100,000,000 tokens, as only their money is obviously used for bankroll, promotion, advisors, hiring, development? Correct me if I am wrong, but it doesn't sound like Betking.io used any of their funds for any of these things said during ico.

You are 100% right.

The same point has been raised before but a poster in the forum mentioned that Dean Nolan said the 30 million Betking tokens would not be used for profit taking BUT once portions of that 30 million are sent out to pay for "bounties, testing bounties, advisors, hiring, future marketing and development" then they will be eligble for profit taking. Now here is the key part:

There was no audit. There is no audit. Dean Nolan will not allow independent audits. There is no evidence who money was paid to and for what purpose. If virtually the same identical Betking website that closed in December 2016 was re-opened in 2017 after the ICO then why was development needed? That is the primary reason some people say Dean Nolan has scammed investors by siphoning funds from the ICO to his own pockets citing "promotion, advisors, hiring, development". As for 50% of the ICO funds going to bankroll, there is audit to prove this happened or will ever happen and that is another reason why some people call Betking and Dean Nolan scam and scammer.

Because his roulette game was dismal in returns Dean Nolan removed it shortly after the re-launch post ICO and it was only in August 2018 (nearly a year later) that he added a couple of plugged-in affiliate games from "Livetable" that needed zero "development" costs and Dean Nolan also added that same 2014/2015/2016 roulette game back.

Why might you say did Dean Nolan do that in August 2018 and start getting active and paying a little more attention to the Betking website? The simple answer is because several people have highlighted what he has done during the ICO fundraising as a reason to avoid this Betking website completely because they are saying that the Betking ICO was underhanded and several people are saying the token purchasing is a scam and several people are saying Dean Nolan is a scammer but the they are not complaining too much about the actual gaming apart from it being low-level old fashioned website.

Dean Nolan thinks by adding a few plugged-in games and by being a little more active on the forum by adding a tennis bet and a football bet here and there, then post in those threads a little more he will deflect attention away from what many see as a blatant scam. No chance.