Quote from: xtraelv on August 28, 2018, 04:25:21 PM

I have nothing to do with this ICO or escrow.

Me Too

Quote

Just a couple of observations and suggestions that have already been mentioned in this thread:
These escrows must have been chosen for a reason - combined reputation of many trades and escrows.

True; they do have good rep.

Quote

I understand at least most of the funds are in a multisig account.

Assumption; not confirmed.

Quote

Perhaps a time-frame should be set for an audit to be completed. (If one hasn't been set already)

Good point; but escrows don't look to be cooperating on this front as apparently they haven't discussed an audit in this thread even though suchmoon made quite a few good observations on this point.

Quote

Multiple currencies were involved and some were traded on exchanges. So it is a bit more complex than it sitting in a single account.

Very True

Quote

Perhaps a list of known values that can be easily verified can be compiled from the information already available in the thread.

None of the info available here is verified by escrows; all is deduction or hearsay. Also, the escrows ain't willing to give any concrete detail; which compounds the suspicion.

Quote

Then someone senior could be appointed to audit the rest in the agreed time-frame.

Any suggestions? Also, will the escrows agree?

Quote

A list of values with edited out details could be provided - that wouldn't involve identifying anyone.

Apparently, the escrows are not in the mood for any transparency on this front. I dunno why or how it can compromise the identity.

Quote

Delays can be annoying but I cannot see these escrow agents risking their long-term reputation.

They shouldn't be risking their reputation by operating in convoluted secrecy; security of funds is a priority; but an audit wouldn't involve handing over the pvt keys. Dunno why escrows are silent on this. Huh