Quote from: AwesomeVinc on August 30, 2018, 11:34:30 PM

Hey guys,

Mick here. I'm currently the community manager at the NVO Project - nice to meet you all, lots of you guys know me already.

This was posted in the Telegram chat yesterday. I edited the original a bit, the meanings were not changed though.

(1) Imed tried to remove Ton from the team after collaborating with him for 1 year but Yanni said 'No'.
(2) Imed intentinally took the domain (nvo.io) at the start of the ICO to have monopoly over the team. Also he isolated Ton from both the escrows & developers (zero communication)
(3) Xenio wasn't a finished project since it never worked as intended. Imed & Nik (developer) lied about it to make the ICO more successful. (Can be verified through GitHub & BitcoinTalk)
(4) A couple of weeks back, Imed tried to forge a signature on a document to apply for a visa in Malta to liquidate the Bitcoin since cryptocurrencies of any kind are banned in Algeria.
(5) When Imed was younger, he had troube with Interpol for buying stolen PayPal accounts (via FedEx shipment).
(6) Imed was living in poverty (sleeping on the street) until he met Yanni
(7) Imed is a pathological liar, narcissist with no empathy and a quick temper. (Can be confirmed by those who have talked with him via a video conference)
( Cool

It's very likely that Imed uses cocaine. Ton & Community members have noticed that he has talked very quick sometimes.
(9) Imed faked a relationship, meaning being interested in Yanni, only to be involved in this project.
(10) Imed sold DVDs in a company owned by Yanni. Imed's official statement was that he owns the company.
(11) Imed has several criminal records locally in Algeria for street violence
(12) Imed does not really know how Bitcoin works & recently learned how to use a block explorer. He read a lot to play his role as a "CTO" by parroting what he read without a full understanding of the technology.
(13) Imed used Ton's girlfriend's name to register a CloudFlare account without permission.
(14) Imed asked for the passports of employees to make sure that they are afraid of him - in the context of doing a background search.
(15) Imed screwed things up with MaidSafe (can be viewed in the SafeNetwork Forum) - starting a discussion (very strong language) because the MaidSafe CEO ignored Imed.
(16) He has no fear lying to people. He's actually so confident that not a lot of people recognize his lies.
(17) Every phone call (team) he would quickly end the conversation with "I'm busy working" when Imed actually wasn't.
(18) When Imed was angry he talked about murdering people with Yanni. To the outside he was "only joking".
(19) Before Ton removed Imed, they had a call after the NVO Community Manager wasn't responding to Imed's messages. Imed "joked" that the Community Manager would need to bent over (Homosexual Joke)
(20) Ton believes that Imed asked the escrows for their home address to send them "gifts". This was most likely to make sure that if things like this happen, they would be on his side (Confirmation on that one is pending since the call was very shaky). Imed told investors and the team he was friends with the escrows - making sure Ton wouldn't talk to the escrows or get Imed removed from the project.

So reviewing this we are looking at at least 5 criminal acts which just go by like this. Can it really be? That's scary.

Hello Mike, we have no reasons to believe you. Those are just empty claims without support, I can literally pull the same out of my ass about any side of this project, including your own self, your neighbor's dog or my own mother. Writing bullet points and trying to sound serious doesn't make things true. It will never be really clear what happened, to me all the people that support any of the developers or take heavy sides are part of the whole fiasco. After all, you are paid by one of the sides, you've been put as a community manager by the same person that lied to us for months and had zero grasp on the project.

Most of the claims you made come from your boss, they are empty and have zero value. Surely, they could make us think and consider the possibility of them true, but I have no reason to trust your boss that hasn't been upfront and refused transparency for a year with stupid excuses. It's sad to see a rather sensible man, yourself, be blinded by money and sweet talk. This is money speaking, this isn't truth or facts speaking until proven.

And proving such claims is extremely hard if not impossible.

I am sorry, but as far as I am concerned, anything that comes from either of the sides is full of shit. The way your boss handled the downfall was enough for a lot of us to see that he is about as untrustworthy as the person you are trying to attack.

Refund and forget.

Cheers.